Author
Listed:
- Wang, Yiming
- Qi, Changxing
- Rowe, Andrew
- Xie, Gongnan
Abstract
The operational performance of a supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton system is affected by the turbomachinery designs. Moreover, assessing the sensitivity of numerous operating parameters on the system performance is challenging due to high computational costs. This paper assesses a combined cooling, heat and power (CCHP) Brayton system based on metrics of energy, exergy, economic, and environmental impact (4E). Variable-efficiency models incorporating iterative calculation strategies for turbomachinery are developed. Based on this, the 4E system performance is compared under different turbomachinery designs. In this process, integrating with multiple intelligent algorithms (LHS sampling, SVM classification, and ANN surrogate), the SOBOL global sensitivity analysis is applied to the system evaluation. The optimization curve and decision stability regarding the system performance are analyzed. The results indicate that different turbomachinery designs can significantly affect the system exergy efficiency, with evaluation fluctuations exceeding 30% in the exergy destruction of compressor and solution pump. Furthermore, calculating first-order and total-order sensitivity indices with a sample size of 2×105 can take below 300 s, and the quantitative indices align well with the system performance evaluation. Finally, different turbomachinery designs lead to noticeable shifts in the Pareto front and decision points, consistent with the system performance analysis. Levelized cost of energy and environment emissions of the system can be reduced by up to 4.2% and 22.6%, respectively. These optimization results provide design guidance for the Brayton system.
Suggested Citation
Wang, Yiming & Qi, Changxing & Rowe, Andrew & Xie, Gongnan, 2026.
"Multiple intelligent algorithms-based analysis and optimization of a CCHP Brayton system considering different turbomachinery designs,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226018918
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141784
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226018918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.