Author
Listed:
- Heo, SungKu
- Moosazadeh, Mohammad
- Kim, SangYoun
- Jeong, Chanhyeok
- Kim, Sunwoo
- Byun, Jaewon
- Yoo, ChangKyoo
Abstract
The Korean government has highlighted hydrogen (H2) utilization in various sectors to substitute fossil-fired energy resources. However, H2 production has relied on it as a byproduct from the petrochemical industry, yet; sustainable hydrogen production methods should be developed for the clean energy transition. This study aims to examine implementable wastewater-to- H2 production technologies via biogas from anaerobic digestion (AD) in wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) based on techno-economic assessment (TEA) and life-cycle assessment (LCA). Various H2 production pathways combining biogas upgradation, hydrogen production, and carbon capturing systems were compared to search sustainable pathway towards a circular hydrogen economy in South Korea. Then nationwide supply and demand scenario through 2050 was analyzed based on the wastewater big dataset from more than 3000 WWTPs in South Korea. The results verified that BUS-TRMre-CCU (Tri-reforming of methane with flue gas recycling, biogas upgrading system, and carbon capturing unit) was assessed as the best candidate for wastewater-to-H2 production because it can produce the hydrogen as 4.49 $/kg H2 and GHG potential of 8.14 kgCO2-eq/kgH2. This H2 production pathway has competitiveness compared to conventional off-site H2 production due to on-site H2 production in WWTPs across South Korea. In alignment with strict action towards a circular hydrogen economy, this research indicated that the BUS-TRMre-CCU can be practically implemented to accelerate the hydrogen economy by covering regional H2 demand as on-site H2 supply across South Korea.
Suggested Citation
Heo, SungKu & Moosazadeh, Mohammad & Kim, SangYoun & Jeong, Chanhyeok & Kim, Sunwoo & Byun, Jaewon & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2026.
"Techno-economic and environmental assessments of implementable wastewater-to-hydrogen production technologies: Pathway towards circular hydrogen economy in South Korea,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226018876
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141780
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226018876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.