Author
Listed:
- Sun, Yu
- Tang, Yong
- Zhang, Zhuxin
- Liu, Mengyun
- Qin, Jiazheng
- He, Youwei
Abstract
Geological carbon storage (GCS) is an essential technology for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and achieving carbon neutrality. However, selecting available storage sites remains challenging due to uncertainties within a hierarchical network of geological and engineering parameters. This study proposes an integrated assessment model combining the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with multilevel fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (MFCE). The tailored framework employs bottom-up aggregation for multi-criteria decision-making in site selection, and adopts a sinusoidal membership function to characterize the ambiguous fuzzy boundaries. The workflow involves indicator screening, comparison, quantification, and ranking. The proposed AHP-MFCE model is applied to six blocks in the Sichuan Basin, with modeling practice for the target site. A comprehensive indicator system is established, comprising 33 sub-indicators across four categories: reservoir, caprock, well, and surface conditions. After passing the consistency check (CR = 0.0006 < 0.1), the category weights are determined as 0.3991, 0.2740, 0.1938, and 0.1330, respectively. Sub-indicators with composite weights exceeding 0.02 should be prioritized to reduce subjective impacts and enhance the objectivity of the evaluation results. Field studies indicate that Blocks #E and #D are identified as potential GCS candidates. Blocks #A, #B, and #C are rated as average, while Block #F is classified as fair. Numerical simulation coupled with geochemical reactions for Block #E confirms its considerable storage capacity and injectivity. The findings support site selection for pilot-scale GCS projects in depleted gas reservoirs and contribute to long-term storage safety and leakage risk mitigation.
Suggested Citation
Sun, Yu & Tang, Yong & Zhang, Zhuxin & Liu, Mengyun & Qin, Jiazheng & He, Youwei, 2026.
"Siting assessment for CO2 sequestration in depleted gas reservoirs based on multilevel fuzzy evaluation method: From field screening to mechanistic modeling,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226017457
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141638
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226017457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.