Author
Listed:
- Zhao, Chuandang
- Yang, Zhuoqian
- Han, Ke
Abstract
Freight electrification is critical for road transport decarbonization, yet cost-effective and grid-compatible energy replenishment for large fleets remains challenging as commercial trucks have high energy demand and tight delivery schedules. This paper develops an integrated optimization framework for freight depots to compare three replenishment modes: battery swapping, fast charging, and vehicle-to-grid operation, with optional on-site solar power and fixed battery storage. The framework co-optimizes depot energy infrastructure and transport–energy scheduling for a given transport task, using aggregated fleet energy flows to represent the interaction between vehicle operations and depot energy management. Case studies show that battery swapping achieves the highest vehicle utilization and requires the smallest fleet, whereas V2G requires more trucks but can attain the lowest total cost through electricity price arbitrage. Photovoltaic investment is attractive across all modes, but under realistic depot space constraints, solar power supplies only 2%–11% of truck charging energy. Fixed battery storage is not economically attractive for freight depots under current cost and electricity price conditions. High solar power penetration reduces the marginal value of trucks as mobile storage. Extended analyses further examine freight demand fluctuations, endogenous service demand, empirical depot arrival-departure profiles, and V2G battery degradation cost. The findings offer useful managerial and policy insights for designing freight depot replenishment systems.
Suggested Citation
Zhao, Chuandang & Yang, Zhuoqian & Han, Ke, 2026.
"Comparative optimization of replenishment modes for electric freight depots with on-site solar power,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226017160
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141609
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226017160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.