Author
Listed:
- Chu, Jianwen
- Li, Huiquan
- Li, Qiang
Abstract
The greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have attracted widespread attention. Currently, the characteristics and reduction strategies of batteries GHG emissions under the influence of solid-state batteries (SSBs) remain unclear. Therefore, this study combines material flow analysis with the emission factor methods to construct a systematic GHG emissions accounting model for the coexistence of SSB and liquid batteries. It will reveal the GHG emission characteristics of five typical battery chemistries (LFP, LCO, LMO, NCM, and NCA). In addition, this study examines the evolution and the reduction strategies of GHG emissions under the influence of SSB and energy transition through scenario analysis. The results show that the LFP battery had the highest life-cycle GHG emissions among the five batteries in 2023 in China. If no measures are taken, the total emissions are expected to increase by 350% by 2035. It is worth noting that SSB substitution scenarios have not achieved net emissions reductions in the short term. It is difficult to achieve carbon reduction solely through material changes such as SSB. Material changes require the cooperation of green power and energy transition to achieve a 49% reduction in emissions. The standardized waste management and green power scenarios can achieve significant reductions in emissions. It is important to note that the deployment of green power in specific regions should align with enterprises' geographical locations to ensure synergy between carbon reduction and economic benefits. Although cascading utilization extends battery lifespan, its potential for reducing emissions is not as significant as expected. The study has identified key strategies for the battery industry to reduce life-cycle emissions, providing a scientific basis for policy formulation.
Suggested Citation
Chu, Jianwen & Li, Huiquan & Li, Qiang, 2026.
"The impact of solid-state batteries on greenhouse gas emissions of batteries from the life cycle perspective,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226016804
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141573
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226016804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.