IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v360y2026ics0360544226016774.html

Standardized benchmarking of direct air capture technologies: techno-economic and environmental assessment, and multi-criteria decision analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Bouaboula, Houssam
  • Belmabkhout, Youssef
  • Zaabout, Abdelghafour

Abstract

Large-scale deployment of direct air capture (DAC) technologies is essential to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, yet selecting suitable DAC approaches remains challenging due to their diverse operating principles, maturity levels, and inconsistent performance data. Here, we develop a standardized comparative framework to assess four DAC technologies (HT-Aq, TVSA, MSA, and pH-swing) under consistent climate conditions, process assumptions, capture capacities, energy prices, and carbon intensities. The framework couples physics-based process modelling, enabling technology-specific unit sizing, with techno-economic and life-cycle assessment and advanced multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Key performance indicators, including energy and water demand, levelized CO2 cost, and global warming impact, are quantified and used to rank DAC technologies across sectoral applications. The results effectively demonstrated that no DAC technology is universally optimal across all examined scenarios. We found liquid-DAC approaches (HT-Aq and pH-swing) to exhibit limited SEC variations across climate conditions, although their water demand increases significantly under dry environments. In contrast, solid-sorbent DAC systems (TVSA and MSA) are highly sensitive to ambient conditions and achieve optimal SEC under relatively humid environments (50%). HT-Aq process is found to be the most cost-effective under large-scale applications (>10 ktCO2/year), but its cost-effectiveness diminishes when lifecycle CO2 emissions are considered. On the other hand, due to its high sensitivity to electricity prices, pH-swing DAC process is found to be the closest approach to achieving the target DAC cost (100 $/tCO2), provided that low-cost electricity (<20 $/MWh) is used and that hydrogen byproducts are sold at reasonable market prices (>4 $/kg). Overall, the results of this work provide guidelines for supporting decision-makers in identifying the most suitable DAC technologies under various operating conditions and targeted applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Bouaboula, Houssam & Belmabkhout, Youssef & Zaabout, Abdelghafour, 2026. "Standardized benchmarking of direct air capture technologies: techno-economic and environmental assessment, and multi-criteria decision analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226016774
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544226016774
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2026.141570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226016774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.