Author
Listed:
- Kuo, Po-Chih
- Tanaka, Yohei
- Takada, Naoki
Abstract
As a promising solution to offset emissions from carbon-intensive and hard-to-abate sectors, bioenergy conversion with carbon capture and utilization (BECCU) technologies play a vital role in achieving carbon-negative emissions. This study is aimed at developing complete BECCU process chain models by integrating thermochemical and electrochemical conversion processes and evaluating their biomass-to-power (BtP, ηIII,BtP), biomass-to-liquid (BtL, ηIII,BtL), and overall BECCU (ηIII,overall) conversion efficiencies. The BtP system is coupled with oxy-fuel combustion technology to yield concentrated CO2, which is then used as a carbon source in the CCU process (i.e., power-to-liquid). Three integrated biomass-based polygeneration systems are compared for BECCU applications, considering gasification (Scenario 1), pyrolysis (Scenario 2), and oxyfuel combustion (Scenario 3). Simulations indicate that Scenario 1 achieves the highest overall BtP efficiency (ηIII,BtP) of 21.5%, which is 12.9% and 3.2% higher than those of Scenarios 2 and 3, respectively. In contrast, Scenarios 1 and 3 exhibit nearly equivalent overall BECCU efficiencies (ηIII,overall) of 45.7% and 45.6%, respectively, whereas Scenarios 2 shows the lowest efficiency (21.3%). However, considering the environmental performance, Scenarios 2 exhibits the lowest specific CO2 emissions, as biogenic carbon is retained in biochar as a long-term carbon sink. A net CO2 removal of approximately 0.18 kg-CO2/kg-rice straw can be achieved within a gate-to-gate system boundary. Therefore, among the three cases, Scenario 2 likely represents the most environmentally beneficial pathway with the strongest potential for achieving carbon-negative polygeneration systems.
Suggested Citation
Kuo, Po-Chih & Tanaka, Yohei & Takada, Naoki, 2026.
"Thermodynamic analysis of biomass-driven polygeneration plants with biogenic CO2 utilization: Comparative assessment of various thermochemical conversion technologies,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226015884
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141482
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226015884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.