Author
Listed:
- Dibos, Sina
- Pesch, Thiemo
- Benigni, Andrea
Abstract
Power-to-X solutions play an essential role in decarbonizing multiple energy sectors. Power-to-gas technologies, such as electrolyzers, produce hydrogen while simultaneously generating significant amounts of waste heat. As the coupling between sectors like heat and power intensifies, new opportunities for cost reduction emerge. However, fully exploiting these synergies requires an integrated, cross-sector optimization approach. In this work, we analyze a renewable energy-coupled hydrogen production system to demonstrate how heat demand shapes system design decisions under fluctuating hydrogen and heat price assumptions. We evaluate the operational implications of both including and excluding heat demand during the design phase and investigate how this affects the electrolyzer behavior. After presenting an optimization framework that jointly determines component sizing and operational scheduling within a multi-energy context, three use cases with an increasing role for the electrolyzer waste heat are examined. While the operation without heat recovery results in earnings equal to expenditures, a simple utilization of electrolyzer heat reduces expenditures by 22.1% while maintaining constant profit. Fully integrating waste-heat utilization into the design process increases expenditures by 79.8%, while increasing system profit by 86.5% – both compared to the simple heat recovery. This highlights the importance of cross-sectoral design methodologies for future energy systems. Finally, a comprehensive sensitivity analysis quantifies the influence of assumed energy prices and component capacities on the total annualized cost, identifying the parameters that most critically affect system performance and that should therefore guide system development.
Suggested Citation
Dibos, Sina & Pesch, Thiemo & Benigni, Andrea, 2026.
"Impact of heat demand integration on optimal design and operation of renewable-based electrolyzer system,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226015793
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141473
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226015793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.