Author
Listed:
- Dai, Jiarui
- Huang, Haoda
- Liu, Qingsong
- Li, Chun
- Iglesias, Gregorio
- Bashir, Musa
Abstract
The selection of the rotor configuration for floating vertical axis wind turbines (VAWTs) plays a major role in their energy capture efficiency and structural reliability. The objective of this work is to investigate the differences in performance between different rotor configurations and to clarify the dominant coupling mechanisms under floating conditions. A high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) framework is established by combining dynamic fluid-body interaction (DFBI) and volume of fluid (VOF) models to capture the fully coupled aero-hydrodynamic response. A comparative analysis of full-scale H-type and Φ-type floating VAWTs with the same swept area is performed. The results show that the more compact support structure of the Φ-type rotor reduces flow losses, leading to a higher time-averaged power coefficient of 0.378, compared with 0.201 for the H-type rotor. Although the H-type rotor generates higher torque on the upwind side, its overall power output is weakened by downwind torque fluctuation, tip-vortex effects, and support-arm interference. The wake of the H-type rotor shows stronger flow disturbance and lateral diffusion, while the Φ-type rotor maintains a more coherent downstream wake due to its closed blade-end connections. Due to its larger upwind projected area, the thrust coefficient of the H-type rotor is approximately 9% higher than that of the Φ-type rotor, resulting in larger surge drift and a redistribution of mooring tensions. These findings provide guidance for the rotor–platform integration of floating VAWTs and highlight key design trade-offs that should be considered in future large-scale offshore deployments.
Suggested Citation
Dai, Jiarui & Huang, Haoda & Liu, Qingsong & Li, Chun & Iglesias, Gregorio & Bashir, Musa, 2026.
"Rotor configuration effects on coupled aero-hydro-mooring dynamics of spar-type floating vertical axis wind turbines,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:359:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226016014
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141495
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:359:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226016014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.