Author
Listed:
- Tang, Hong
- Zou, Wenke
- Tang, Rui
- Wang, Shengwei
Abstract
The demand side plays a critical role in achieving carbon neutrality, particularly through the deployment of distributed photovoltaics and hybrid energy storage systems. However, previous studies have not adequately addressed the key factors, such as storage degradation and nonlinear operation optimization, in optimal storage design due to the highly complex and time-consuming process of life cycle assessment. This study, therefore, proposes a systematic and efficient life cycle optimization framework to identify optimal demand-side storage compositions and conducts a comparative techno-economic analysis under typical climate zones and electricity markets. The proposed method adopts K-means clustering for typical day selection and mixed-integer quadratic programming for storage operation optimization, which effectively improves computational efficiency and ensures reliable decision-making while considering life cycle degradation. Results for office buildings show a strong preference for cooling storage in subtropical regions with significant cooling demand, where a cooling storage ratio of 8.03% achieves life cycle cost savings of up to 3.42 times the initial investment. Conversely, regions with lower cooling demands prefer battery storage, and the temperate climate zone is not considered a suitable location for investment in both types of storage. If battery costs are reduced below 180 $/kWh, the economic benefits of hybrid storage composition become more evident than those of cooling storage alone, even in cooling-dominated zones.
Suggested Citation
Tang, Hong & Zou, Wenke & Tang, Rui & Wang, Shengwei, 2026.
"Techno-economic analysis and life cycle design optimization of demand-side hybrid energy storage under different climates and electricity markets,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:359:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226015392
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141433
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:359:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226015392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.