Author
Listed:
- Sun, Zhuangzhuang
- Jiang, Junjie
- Zhu, Yadong
- Chen, Songshan
- Wang, Mengcheng
- Lyu, Ning
- Chen, Jiaqi
Abstract
To improve the energy efficiency during bidirectional pumping operations and enhance urban resilience against the frequent alternation of droughts and floods, this study focused on a bidirectional axial-flow pump with a specific speed of approximately 1400. A comparative analysis of the lift and drag characteristics between a Reversible S-shaped hydrofoil (RSH) and a Reversible Flat-plate hydrofoil (RFH) was conducted, investigating the impact of different reversible hydrofoils on the performance of bidirectional pumps. The results indicate that as the maximum camber ratio increases, the rising trend of the RSH's drag coefficient with increasing lift coefficient becomes more gradual, and its high-efficiency operating range broadens. Specifically, within the lift coefficient range of 0 to 0.42, the drag coefficient of the RSH shows an upward trend, but transitions to a downward trend within the range of 0.42 to 0.8. The RSH is more suitable for bidirectional pump design. The bidirectional pump designed with RSH achieved a significant improvement in maximum efficiency, a wider high-efficiency operating range, and a notable reduction in irreversible losses caused by turbulent dissipation across a broad flow range. Applying the optimized bidirectional impeller to a Bulb Tubular Pump (BTP), the experimental results confirmed that the bidirectional pump designed with RSH possesses superior hydraulic performance. These findings elucidate the influence of reversible hydrofoil selection on the performance of bidirectional pumps and provide a valuable reference for the optimal design of other types of reversible rotating machinery.
Suggested Citation
Sun, Zhuangzhuang & Jiang, Junjie & Zhu, Yadong & Chen, Songshan & Wang, Mengcheng & Lyu, Ning & Chen, Jiaqi, 2026.
"Numerical and experimental investigation of the effects of different reversible hydrofoils on the performance of a bidirectional axial-flow pump,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:356:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226013174
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141211
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:356:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226013174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.