IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v356y2026ics0360544226013009.html

Technical, economic, and environmental analysis of coal co-firing with biomass: A comparative study of gasification co-firing, torrefaction co-firing, and direct co-firing

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Xueqin
  • Sun, Li
  • Li, Yuhan
  • Xuan, Haolin
  • Zheng, Runjia

Abstract

Co-firing biomass with coal is recognized as an effective pathway to reduce carbon emissions from conventional power plants. However, existing research has predominantly focused on direct co-firing, leaving significant gaps in studies on gasification co-firing and torrefaction co-firing. To address these limitations, this study systematically models key co-firing processes—including dedicated coal combustion, direct co-firing, gasification co-firing, and torrefaction co-firing—with particular emphasis on integrating the torrefaction process with existing power plant systems to minimize energy consumption and carbon emissions.Based on the models, a systematic comparative study is conducted to evaluate the energy efficiency, exergy efficiency, unit electricity production cost, and CO2 emission under different co-firing processes, biomass types, and co-firing ratios. Through sensitivity analysis, the main factors influencing production costs and CO2 emissions are investigated, and recommendations for controlling costs and CO2 emissions are proposed. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: The boiler efficiency of torrefaction co-firing is higher than that of gasification co-firing but lower than that of direct co-firing. Among the three co-firing methods, gasification co-firing exhibits the lowest exergy efficiency, followed by torrefaction co-firing, while direct co-firing demonstrates the highest exergy efficiency. For sawdust biomass, when the co-firing ratio increases from 0 to approximately 25%, the CO2 emissions of direct co-firing, gasification co-firing, and torrefaction co-firing decrease from 1.041 kg/kWh to 0.72, 0.63, and 0.71 kg/kWh, respectively, while the unit production costs increase by 8.5%, 7.3%, and 4.8%, respectively.This study offers important practical references for reducing carbon emissions through biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Xueqin & Sun, Li & Li, Yuhan & Xuan, Haolin & Zheng, Runjia, 2026. "Technical, economic, and environmental analysis of coal co-firing with biomass: A comparative study of gasification co-firing, torrefaction co-firing, and direct co-firing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:356:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226013009
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544226013009
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2026.141194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:356:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226013009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.