Author
Listed:
- Payne, Harrison
- Moriarty, Patrick
- Pourmousavi Kani, Ali
- Soong, Wen L.
- Peter, Kevin
Abstract
The transition to 100% renewable energy systems presents significant challenges in maintaining grid reliability, particularly in systems with large amounts of variable renewable energy sources. This study develops a comprehensive multi-nodal optimisation framework to assess the long term storage requirements of 100% renewable energy grids under conservative operating assumptions. Using South Australia as a gigawatt-scale case study, the developed mixed-integer linear program is used to assess the storage requirement across seven regions incorporating transmission constraints, DC power flow with linearised losses, multiple storage technologies with temporal classifications, and correlated renewable generation profiles. Under conservative operating conditions, the results indicate a maximum storage requirement of 7.28 GW and 644 GWh across the investigation period (2045–2051). Winter emerges as the most critical season for storage sizing, with widespread renewable energy droughts occurring across geographically correlated regions, limiting the availability of interstate support. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that modelling more realistic operating scenarios, such as including modest amounts of dispatchable generation (1%–3% of total annual demand), can reduce storage requirements by up to 78%. In contrast, the importance of considering multi-year climate data is demonstrated with storage sizing varying by more than 500 GWh between weather years. Across all analyses, the median requirement of South Australia is 4.27 GW and 162 GWh. The modelling framework and subsequent findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and grid planners working towards the goal of a 100% renewable energy grid.
Suggested Citation
Payne, Harrison & Moriarty, Patrick & Pourmousavi Kani, Ali & Soong, Wen L. & Peter, Kevin, 2026.
"Multi-nodal optimisation of energy storage requirements for 100% renewable energy grid: A South Australian case study,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:356:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226012284
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141123
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:356:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226012284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.