IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v355y2026ics0360544226012910.html

Mitigating systemic risk in cascade hydropower generation: A high-dimensional vine copula framework for correlated inflow uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jiqing
  • Xie, Yutao
  • Meng, Xin
  • Hu, Binyang
  • Cao, Chenglin
  • Huang, Ke

Abstract

In the architecture of modern clean energy systems, cascade hydropower system function as the backbone of grid stability, playing a critical role in smoothing fluctuations from intermittent renewables and ensuring operational security. However, as global climate change intensifies, the uncertainty inherent in runoff forecasting is exhibiting increasingly complex nonlinear propagation and spatial superposition effects across multi-reservoir systems. These dynamics create systemic risks that are difficult to quantify using traditional linear models. We employed a C-vine copula model to precisely capture the “leptokurtic, heavy-tailed” characteristics and asymmetric spatial dependence structure of runoff forecast errors among hydrological stations within the basin. Subsequently, a power generation optimization scheduling model encompassing the lower Jinsha River cascade (Wudongde, Baihetan, Xiluodu, Xiangjiaba) and the Three Gorges Reservoir was constructed and solved via a Differential Evolution algorithm. Empirical results from daily-scale simulations reveal unique risk distribution patterns: (1) Spatial Dependency: The C-vine structure confirms that the Cuntan Station, serving as the basin's hydrological hub, exhibits significant upstream-tail (simultaneous flood occurrence) correlation risks with tributaries during high-water periods, indicating high spatial synchrony in extreme flood events; (2) Physical attenuation mechanism: Risk propagation between cascade reservoirs follows a “central aggregation, peripheral dissipation” pattern. The massive regulating reservoirs of Baihetan and Xiluodu absorb flow fluctuations from the upstream Wudongde, decoupling the upstream volatility from the downstream Three Gorges Reservoir, though they bear higher operational deviation risks themselves; (3) Resilience via Elasticity: Systemic risks are highly sensitive to the rigidty of scheduling constraints. Expanding the allowable deviation range from ±2% to ±8%, activates the joint regulation potential of cascade reservoirs, effectively mitigating over 90% of random disturbances. This study clarifies the distinct roles of reservoirs with varying regulation capabilities in risk management, providing theoretical support for transitioning from deterministic scheduling to a risk-oriented resilient scheduling paradigm.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jiqing & Xie, Yutao & Meng, Xin & Hu, Binyang & Cao, Chenglin & Huang, Ke, 2026. "Mitigating systemic risk in cascade hydropower generation: A high-dimensional vine copula framework for correlated inflow uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:355:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226012910
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544226012910
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2026.141185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:355:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226012910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.