IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v353y2026ics0360544226011345.html

Energy efficiency, carbon footprint, and profitability of winter wheat under different production types and cultivation patterns: A 12-year field study

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Shuang
  • Abubakar, Sunusi Amin
  • Li, Huijie
  • Si, Zhuanyun
  • Li, Sen
  • Wang, Guangshuai
  • Zhou, Tao
  • Duan, Fangzhi
  • Ma, Qianqian
  • Si, Bingcheng

Abstract

Sustainable grain production in the North China Plain (NCP) faces persistent yield–environment trade-offs. High–low seedbed cultivation (HLSC) offers yield benefits, yet long-term field evidence integrating energy, environmental, and economic performance across different production organizations remains limited. Here, a 12-year field experiment was conducted to evaluate four wheat production systems formed by the combination of two production types (cooperative vs. smallholder farming) and two cultivation patterns (HLSC vs. flat cultivation, FC). Grain yield, energy budgets, carbon footprint, soil carbon sequestration, and economic performance were assessed to quantify system-level sustainability outcomes. Results showed that cooperative farming combined with high-low seedbed cultivation (C-HLSC) consistently outperformed other treatments across multiple sustainability dimensions. Compared with the smallholder with flat cultivation (S-FC), C-HLSC increased grain yield by 12.1% and net income by 67.7%, while achieving the only benefit–cost ratio exceeding unity (1.06). Despite relatively low energy input (29.23 GJ ha−1), C-HLSC produced the highest net energy output (269.6 GJ ha−1), resulting in superior energy-use efficiency (10.3) and energy productivity (0.31 kg MJ−1). Simultaneously, carbon performance improved markedly, with the lowest grain-scaled carbon footprint (0.66 kg CE kg−1) and the greatest annual soil organic carbon sequestration (698.0 kg CO2-eq ha−1). These improvements indicate that enhanced productivity diluted energy and carbon intensity while coordinated farm management improved operational efficiency and economic returns. Overall, the C-HLSC pattern therefore represents a practical pathway for advancing energy-efficient and low-carbon wheat production, providing empirical support for policies promoting cooperative farming and resource-efficient cultivation strategies in the NCP and comparable agroecosystems worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Shuang & Abubakar, Sunusi Amin & Li, Huijie & Si, Zhuanyun & Li, Sen & Wang, Guangshuai & Zhou, Tao & Duan, Fangzhi & Ma, Qianqian & Si, Bingcheng, 2026. "Energy efficiency, carbon footprint, and profitability of winter wheat under different production types and cultivation patterns: A 12-year field study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:353:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226011345
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544226011345
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2026.141029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:353:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226011345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.