Author
Listed:
- Murali, R.
- Razlan, Z.M.
- Bakar, S.A.
- Rojan, M.A.
- Ishak, A.A.
- Mohamad, M.S.
- Ibrahim, Z.
Abstract
Stricter global emission standards necessitate the optimization of internal combustion engine exhaust systems to enhance energy efficiency. Penetrating exhaust manifolds (PEMs) are widely adopted for their energy-conservation potential. However, their configuration for high-speed, small-displacement engines remains limited. This study integrates computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with experimental testing to evaluate flow losses and optimize PEM geometry for a 115-cc single-cylinder spark ignition (SI) engine. The CFD model was validated against experimental temperature and velocity data at 5000–8000 rpm, achieving a maximum error of 9.17%. Flow loss was characterized by entropy production as an indicator of energy degradation within the muffler first expansion chamber. A derived multiple linear regression model predicted the total pressure loss coefficient (K) with a maximum error of 7.8%. Statistical analysis identified the divergence angle (∅) as the dominant parameter, accounting for 47.3% of the model variance. Reducing the penetration length (L) to 0.03 m decreased frictional losses, resulting in an absolute loss reduction of 1.63 (14.82%). Among the tested configurations, ∅ = 12° achieved the highest improvement, reducing K by 2.61 (26.38%). Entropy analysis further confirmed that the 12° configuration minimized system irreversibility by redirecting exhaust flow away from the chamber end surface. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing PEM geometry to minimize pressure losses in small, high-speed SI engines.
Suggested Citation
Murali, R. & Razlan, Z.M. & Bakar, S.A. & Rojan, M.A. & Ishak, A.A. & Mohamad, M.S. & Ibrahim, Z., 2026.
"Predictive modeling of total pressure loss in a high-speed SI engine exhaust manifold: Influence of penetration length and divergence angle,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:352:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226009321
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140829
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:352:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226009321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.