Author
Listed:
- Niu, Xiaojuan
- Lei, Youzhe
- Fu, Ya’nan
- Liu, Xinze
- Li, Haoran
- Hong, Wenpeng
Abstract
The compressed CO2 energy storage system has emerged as a promising and efficient technology that has received increasing attention in recent years. However, research on its integration with solar tower power generation remains limited, leading to an insufficient understanding of its operating characteristics, overall performance, and key governing parameters in solar power applications. To address this research gap, the manuscript constructs four compressed CO2 energy storage systems integrated with solar tower technology, namely subcritical, transcritical, liquid, and supercritical configurations. The effects of key design parameters on system performance are examined in a systematic manner, and a comparative evaluation of the four systems is provided. A comparative assessment of the four systems is presented, and a representative day simulation is performed for the most competitive configuration. Results reveal that higher turbine inlet temperature, energy storage pressure, and energy release pressure consistently enhance energy storage density, whereas compressor inlet pressure exerts non-uniform influences. Among the four systems, the liquid CO2 configuration shows distinct advantages in energy storage density while maintaining high energy, thermal, and exergy efficiencies. Under summer solstice conditions, heliostat field efficiency is more sensitive to direct normal irradiance than receiver efficiency, with maxima of 69.41% and 88.20%, respectively. During the winter solstice, shorter duration and lower intensity of solar radiation restrict storage capacity and reduce the discharge period to around 8 h, although rated power output can still be sustained.
Suggested Citation
Niu, Xiaojuan & Lei, Youzhe & Fu, Ya’nan & Liu, Xinze & Li, Haoran & Hong, Wenpeng, 2026.
"Performance comparison and evaluation of four compressed CO₂ energy storage systems integrated into tower solar power generation,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:351:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226008844
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140781
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:351:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226008844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.