IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v351y2026ics0360544226008510.html

Carbon emission evaluation for regional public institutions operation phase based on improved LightGBM and carbon emission efficiency ratio

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Miao
  • Chen, Cheng
  • Huang, Xiaofei
  • Tian, Lina
  • Xie, Jiaqing
  • Gao, Zhiming
  • Zhou, Xuan
  • Yan, Junwei

Abstract

Regional carbon emission assessment can effectively urge public institutions to actively carry out energy conservation and emission reduction transformations. This is crucial for achieving China's ‘dual carbon’ goals. In the study, the operating carbon emissions and influencing factors for four types of public institutions in warm winter-hot summer regions from 2019 to 2022 were collected. Pandemic index, interactive characteristics and lag characteristics of carbon emissions were constructed. The study conducted structural modifications to the standard LightGBM. And carbon emission models have been created based on multiple models. The predictive performance of multiple models was compared. Based on the SHAP model, the global and local interpretability of the carbon emission prediction process was evaluated. Finally, based on the improved LightGBM, the carbon emission efficiency of public institutions was proposed, and the scale of carbon emission efficiency ratio (CEER) was formulated. By comparing the common ranking method, the evaluation method based on CEER method was verified to be effective. The results showed that the improved LightGBM exhibited excellent performance in prediction, ensuring stable prediction stability and improving training efficiency. The evaluation results of the SHAP model showed that the inherent characteristics of public institutions (building area, number of energy users and headcount) were the decisive factors of carbon emissions. Compared with the ordinary ranking quota method, CEER evaluation method not only considered more influencing factors, but also added the necessary baseline. It increased the fairness and scientificity of the carbon emission assessment of regional public institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Miao & Chen, Cheng & Huang, Xiaofei & Tian, Lina & Xie, Jiaqing & Gao, Zhiming & Zhou, Xuan & Yan, Junwei, 2026. "Carbon emission evaluation for regional public institutions operation phase based on improved LightGBM and carbon emission efficiency ratio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:351:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226008510
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544226008510
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2026.140748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:351:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226008510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.