IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v351y2026ics0360544226008285.html

Thermal storage vs. battery storage in urban microgrids: A techno-economic assessment of hybrid PV–PTC–ORC systems with storage

Author

Listed:
  • Medghalchi, Zahra
  • Taylan, Onur

Abstract

This study evaluates the techno-economic performance of hybrid solar energy systems designed for urban microgrids, with a particular focus on the role of thermal energy storage (TES) as an alternative to battery energy storage systems (BESS). A detailed thermo-economic model integrating photovoltaics (PV), parabolic trough collectors (PTC), thermal storage, and an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) is developed and coupled with a hybrid PSO-GA optimization framework. The main goal is to minimize the weighted average cost of energy (waCOE) while maintaining a target share of renewable energy (FRES). Realistic operating conditions are considered by analyzing flow rates of both heat transfer and working fluids, the ORC efficiency variations, and partial load effects on turbine behavior. This formulation creates a high-dimensional (9D), non-linear optimization problem that explicitly couples thermodynamic off-design performance with economic dispatch strategies. To address this nonlinearity and multi-variable optimization, a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm combining Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and the Genetic Algorithm (GA) is employed to determine the optimal sizes of system components, such as the PTC, PV field, TES, turbine, condenser, pump, evaporator, and heat exchangers. Three different setups, PV + BESS, PTC + TES + ORC, and PV + BESS + PTC + TES + ORC, are evaluated from both technical and economic viewpoints. The optimized PV + BESS + PTC + TES + ORC hybrid configuration (14×38MW PTC, 1.76MW PV, 121.53MWh TES, and 774.65kW ORC) with zero BESS capacity, suggesting displacing BESS with TES for PV-PTC-ORC hybrid systems. This optimized system delivers the lowest waCOE of 0.2378€/kWh, achieving a demand supply fraction (DSF) of 57.18% and a FRES of 82.00%. Finally, a sensitivity analysis of waCOE and FRES with respect to system component capacities is performed, which confirms the robustness and adaptability of the proposed hybrid design. These findings offer quantitative evidence that hybrid solar-thermal systems with TES can enhance urban energy resilience, reduce reliance on battery materials, and support cost-effective decarbonization strategies for cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Medghalchi, Zahra & Taylan, Onur, 2026. "Thermal storage vs. battery storage in urban microgrids: A techno-economic assessment of hybrid PV–PTC–ORC systems with storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:351:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226008285
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544226008285
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2026.140725?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:351:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226008285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.