IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v350y2026ics0360544226007449.html

Energy transition and urban green technological innovation: Evidence from new energy demonstration city policy

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao, Liming
  • Jia, Junyan
  • Lei, Qian
  • Zhang, Zhenhua

Abstract

Green technological innovation serves as an effective instrument for achieving a balance between high-quality economic development and ecological environmental governance. Using the new energy demonstration city policy (NEDCP) as a quasi-natural experiment, this study employs a Propensity Score Matching–Difference-in-Differences (PSM-DID) approach to assess the impact of the NEDCP on urban green technological innovation (UGTI) across 282 Chinese cities. The empirical analysis draws the following conclusions. The NEDCP significantly promotes UGTI, a conclusion substantiated by multiple robustness tests. The heterogeneity outcomes show that NEDCP can have varying effects on UGTI depending on a city's initial level of green technology development, geographic location, and classification. The mechanism analysis demonstrates that NEDCP enhances UGTI by improving energy utilization efficiency. Ecological resilience weakens the effectiveness of NEDCP in promoting UGTI. These results provide theoretical and empirical support for refining the NEDCP and offer new insights for advancing regional sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao, Liming & Jia, Junyan & Lei, Qian & Zhang, Zhenhua, 2026. "Energy transition and urban green technological innovation: Evidence from new energy demonstration city policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:350:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226007449
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544226007449
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2026.140641?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:350:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226007449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.