Author
Listed:
- Al, Kübra
- Noyan Tekeli, Fatma
- Coşkuner Filiz, Bilge
- Kantürk Figen, Aysel
Abstract
Liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHCs) are a promising solution for safe and long-distance hydrogen carriers in the hydrogen (H2) value chain relying on the reversible hydrogenation-dehydrogenation cycle. The efficient performance and economic feasibility of this approach are based on the design of efficient and selective bifunctional catalysts for LOHC cycles. This paper provides a systematic bifunctional catalyst design approach for LOHC hydrogenation–dehydrogenation cycles using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) combined with technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) was used to selected the best bifunctional catalyst based on active metal phase, support material, synthesis method steps, and process-related parameters. The catalyst exhibiting the best performance was synthesized via a incipient wetness impregnation method (IWIM), involving drying and reduction steps following the pretreatment stage. Based on this MCDM analysis, the Pd–Ru (2–2 wt%) catalyst supported on Al2O3 emerged as the most active bifunctional catalyst with long term stability, hydrogenation and dehydrogenation steps for LOHC couples. This study demonstrates in embedding MCDM tools into the rational design of bifunctional LOHC catalysts, thereby establishing a quantitative and systematic pathway for pre-experimental catalyst selection. The proposed framework offers a transferable decision-support methodology that can facilitate and accelerate catalyst development in LOHC-based H2 storage and transportation systems.
Suggested Citation
Al, Kübra & Noyan Tekeli, Fatma & Coşkuner Filiz, Bilge & Kantürk Figen, Aysel, 2026.
"Bifunctional catalyst design for hydrogenation-dehydrogenation cycle of liquid organic hydrogen carrier couples by multi-criteria decision method,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:349:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226007371
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140634
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:349:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226007371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.