Author
Listed:
- Wang, Yue
- Wang, Zhong
- Qin, Yong
- Wang, Luwei
- Luo, Yuyan
Abstract
Power sector transition will generate profound socio-economic impacts and reshape the regional distribution of benefits and burdens. This study integrates a spatially explicit power sector optimisation model with a multi-model assessment framework to provide a comprehensive assessment of the regional impacts for China's power sector transition. The results reveal that: (1) Decarbonisation produces substantial economic gains and jobs. Under the 1.5 °C scenario, GDP increases by 1737.12 billion Renminbi and 660.63 thousand additional operations & maintenance jobs are created compared to the business as usual (BAU) scenario. However, benefits are unevenly distributed, concentrated in Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, and Gansu. Shandong, Hunan, and Hubei have low economic gains, accounting for only 4% of the national total, and facing re-employment challenges for coal power plant workers over 1000 km. (2) The co-benefits of air quality are significant, with nationwide decreases in particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5), sulfur dioxide, and oxynitride concentrations. In heavily polluted regions, PM2.5 concentrations fall from over 13 μg/m3 to below 3 μg/m3. The deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) leads to a pollutant rebound, with Shandong, Jiangsu, Guangdong, and Guizhou projected to face higher PM2.5 concentrations. (3) Expansion of renewable energy results in significant water savings but requires large land inputs, 19.13–27.43 thousand km2, primarily in Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, and Gansu. (4) The Gini index rises under decarbonisation scenarios, exacerbating regional inequalities. CCS can alleviate socio-economic inequalities to a certain extent. Shandong and the central provinces will bear heavier burdens compared to the BAU scenario.
Suggested Citation
Wang, Yue & Wang, Zhong & Qin, Yong & Wang, Luwei & Luo, Yuyan, 2026.
"Assessing the regional impacts of the transition in China's power sector,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:348:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226006808
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140577
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:348:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226006808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.