Author
Listed:
- Kardaš Ančić, Danijela
- Komatina, Mirko
- Gvero, Petar
- Knežević, Bojan
- Pupčević, Milan
Abstract
This study presents an experimental investigation of the electrical performance of a conventional photovoltaic (PV) panel and a photovoltaic–thermal (PVT) hybrid system under real meteorological conditions in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The impact of varying water mass flow rates (0.017–0.067 kg/s) through a carbon steel heat exchanger on the PVT panel temperature, electrical efficiency, power output, thermal efficiency, and thermal energy storage (TES) was analyzed, with ambient temperature, solar irradiance, and wind speed recorded throughout the experiments. Experiments conducted in July demonstrated that the PVT system consistently maintained lower operating temperatures (maximum 48.86 °C) compared to the reference PV panel (maximum 61.22 °C), resulting in improved electrical efficiency and reduced temperature-related losses. The PVT system exhibited higher electrical efficiency than the reference PV panel, with efficiency improvements ranging from 4.2 % at the lowest mass flow rate (0.017 kg/s) to 7.1 % at the highest flow rate (0.067 kg/s). At this highest flow rate, the PVT system achieved its best overall performance, with an electrical efficiency of 16.21 %, an average electrical power output of 73.01 W, a daily TES temperature rise of 6.6 °C, and a thermal efficiency of 41.46 %. These results confirm that enhanced heat removal directly supports improved photovoltaic performance and demonstrate that appropriate thermal management enables simultaneous improvement of electrical and thermal energy conversion, highlighting the potential of low-cost carbon steel heat exchangers for practical and efficient PVT operation under real operating conditions.
Suggested Citation
Kardaš Ančić, Danijela & Komatina, Mirko & Gvero, Petar & Knežević, Bojan & Pupčević, Milan, 2026.
"Experimental comparison of the electrical efficiency of photovoltaics and photovoltaics-thermal hybrid system in real operation conditions,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:348:y:2026:i:c:s036054422600664x
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140561
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:348:y:2026:i:c:s036054422600664x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.