Author
Listed:
- Popov, Rumen
- Petrova, Slaveya
- Nikolov, Bogdan
- Yordanov, Emil
- Kazandzieva, Svetlozara
- Klimentova-Nikolova, Yanina
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to analyze and assess the impact of two types of photovoltaic constructions (stationary fixed and solar tracked PV panels, respectively) on some environmental properties and the biodiversity. We found that the light intensity was significantly affected by both types of PV systems when comparing to the control, especially during the spring and summer, as well as both air and soil temperature, soil humidity and pH. The number of invertebrates, as well as the number of taxa, were found to be significantly higher in the control area in the period May-September, but during the colder months it was higher below the PV panels. When comparing the two types of constructions, the stationary panels have more pronounced negative effect on invertebrate fauna than the rotating ones during the whole period. The energy engineering analysis included a simulation of the energy production and a quantitative assessment of the impact of the engineering aspects of two studied PV systems on environmental parameters and biodiversity. The results showed that the specific area affected by solar tracked PV system is about three times larger than those of the stationary ones. By effectively integrating biodiversity into energy system planning, we can help ensure effective mitigation of these impacts and particularly positive biodiversity outcomes in renewable energy projects.
Suggested Citation
Popov, Rumen & Petrova, Slaveya & Nikolov, Bogdan & Yordanov, Emil & Kazandzieva, Svetlozara & Klimentova-Nikolova, Yanina, 2026.
"Stationary versus solar tracked PV systems – which one has lower impact on biodiversity?,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:348:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226005815
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140478
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:348:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226005815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.