IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v346y2026ics0360544226002690.html

Pipeline sharing: Remaining capacity evaluation for liquid ammonia transportation in multi-product pipelines under variable flow rate

Author

Listed:
  • Tu, Renfu
  • Liu, Chunying
  • Zhang, Hao
  • Fu, Guangtao
  • Huang, Mingyue
  • Wang, Bohong
  • Chen, Yujie
  • Liao, Qi
  • Liang, Yongtu

Abstract

As an effective carrier for hydrogen storage and transportation, ammonia energy emerges as a crucial solution to address the spatial imbalance between renewable energy supply and demand, driving the anticipated large-scale, long-distance transportation needs for liquid ammonia. While pipelines represent an economically viable and safe mode for continuous transportation of liquid energy, current multi-product pipelines predominantly operate at low capacity, leading to severe infrastructure underutilization. This study proposes utilizing pipeline remaining capacity for transporting liquid ammonia. We develop a spatiotemporal-capable evaluation methodology applicable to pipelines with sequential transportation. However, ammonia presents challenges related to gasification and electrostatic safety during pipeline transport, particularly concerning flow rates. Our methodology addresses these challenges by incorporating variable flow rate requirements to accommodate operational boundary disparities between liquid ammonia and oil products, thereby ensuring pipeline safety. A hybrid temporal representation method is innovatively proposed, embedding continuous time windows within discrete temporal frameworks to accurately differentiate ammonia batches from oil batches in the model. This approach preserves computational efficiency while enabling precise scheduling and safety velocity constraints for ammonia batches. The evaluation model also integrates two contract-guided parameters to facilitate scenario-based exploration of remaining capacity utilization. Through controlled variable analysis based on the case study of China's Lanzhou-Changsha Pipeline, we conduct horizontal comparisons of ammonia transportation volumes in different scenarios and vertical investigations into influencing mechanisms of remaining capacity. The results indicate that: i) significant utilization variations arise from batch positioning, which is governed by the temporal-spatial matching between injection timing and pipeline idle windows; ii) an increased number of batches enhances operational flexibility, boosting capacity utilization by 47.40 % in our case; and iii) ammonia transportation volume demonstrates a positive correlation with operational tolerance and an inverse correlation with contractual stringency, reaching scenario-specific trade-off points (5 % and 5 × in our case). This research provides theoretical guidance for the development of "ammonia-hydrogen" energy systems and liquid ammonia transportation via multi-product pipelines, offering practical insights to advance energy transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Tu, Renfu & Liu, Chunying & Zhang, Hao & Fu, Guangtao & Huang, Mingyue & Wang, Bohong & Chen, Yujie & Liao, Qi & Liang, Yongtu, 2026. "Pipeline sharing: Remaining capacity evaluation for liquid ammonia transportation in multi-product pipelines under variable flow rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:346:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226002690
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544226002690
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2026.140167?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:346:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226002690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.