Author
Listed:
- Ma, Ning
- Fan, Lurong
- Yuchi, Qunli
Abstract
With the global trend of carbon neutrality, the market linkage between the carbon market and the green certificate market has drawn considerable attention. However, the market cooperation in China is facing significant challenges, as the green certificate market lacks vitality, and disputes persist over the carbon reduction effect. Meanwhile, the participation of energy-consuming enterprises has been less frequently considered in existing research. Therefore, this paper focuses on the green certificate-carbon bidirectional joint market, which includes both power producers and energy consumers, and analyzes its systematic effects on carbon emissions, renewable energy utilization, and economic benefits by a dynamic multi-agent and multi-stage interaction model. The scenario comparisons under different market mechanisms indicate that: (1) The Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) mechanism can definitely subsidize renewable energy generation, but the additional green power generation needs the consumption requirement weight α exceed the ratio of the existing power generation to the power purchased by quota enterprises. (2) The green certificate-carbon quota conversion (GCC) mechanism under a voluntary green certificate market may have negative effects on the actual systematic carbon reduction. (3) Compared with a single carbon quota limitation, the combination of RPS and GCC can improve systematic carbon reduction by approximately 0.16C1.03% and economic benefits by around 0.5C3%. And the coordination of appropriate policy indicators is a key prerequisite.
Suggested Citation
Ma, Ning & Fan, Lurong & Yuchi, Qunli, 2026.
"The synergy effect analysis of the green certificate-carbon bidirectional joint market based on the dynamic feedback of power producers and consumers,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:345:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226003099
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140207
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:345:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226003099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.