Author
Listed:
- Hríbik, D.
- Variny, M.
- Furda, P.
Abstract
Growing polypropylene production puts pressure on existing propane-propylene separation facilities. While hybrid membrane–distillation configurations have demonstrated energy savings, systematic evaluation of their impact on plant throughput and operational flexibility is missing in literature. In this work, conversion of an existing distillation column (C3 splitter) to a split-feed design and its integration with an upstream membrane unit was investigated for throughput increase without replacing major equipment. Aspen Plus V12 model of a representative C3 splitter (10.32 t/h feed, 82.1 mol% propylene) served as a case study for low-pressure splitter with a heat pump (11 bar, design A) and conventional high-pressure splitter (20 bar, design B). Optimally integrated membrane enabled significant C3 splitter reflux reduction: 40 % (A) and 38 % (B), increasing plant capacity by 56 % (A) or 45 % (B), with further bottlenecks identified in compressor, heat-exchangers, and column hydraulics. Specific energy consumption at increased capacity decreased by only 1.4 % in A and was sensitive to compressor efficiency, whereas it decreased by 30.5 % in B compared to basic operation. Similarly, specific exergy consumption and specific CO2 emissions decreased from 1568 to 1097 kWh/t and from 0.2967 to 0.2076 tCO2/t, respectively. Specific total annual costs amounted to 49.0 to 55.3 EUR/t (A) and to 106.6 to 111.8 EUR/t (B), compared to 51.4 EUR/t (base A) and 126.0 EUR/t (base B) with membrane cost varying from 5000 to 10000 EUR/m2. Hybrid membrane–distillation retrofits proved potential to debottleneck C3 splitters, reusing most existing assets, aiming to advance sustainable and competitive propylene production.
Suggested Citation
Hríbik, D. & Variny, M. & Furda, P., 2026.
"Modeling and debottlenecking of distillation column for C3 fraction for multiple pressure levels,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:345:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226002574
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140155
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:345:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226002574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.