Author
Listed:
- Qiu, Tian
- Ma, Qinglin
- Yuan, Qiyu
- Gao, Ziqiang
- Liu, Peng
- Liu, Chuankai
- Ding, Shuiting
- Gan, Chenyu
- Zhao, Wei
Abstract
Film cooling is widely employed for thermal protection, but it inevitably reduces the performance of the thermodynamic cycle. The performance penalty arises not only because the cooling air bypasses the heating process, but also because of the aerodynamic loss generated during mixing with the mainstream. Extensive efforts have been made to reduce cooling air consumption by improving film cooling effectiveness, while accepting an aerodynamic loss increase as the side effect. However, current research seldom discusses the tradeoff between the reduced air bleeding and increased aerodynamic loss. This paper introduces a cycle-based evaluation for film cooling performance incorporating aerodynamic loss and demonstrates that minimizing aerodynamic loss, rather than simply reducing air bleeding, should be the primary criterion for film cooling design. A semi-theoretical model is developed, combining cycle analysis, coolant bleeding, and aerodynamic loss calculation. A comparative study is conducted between the optimal designs obtained under the conventional criterion and the proposed cycle-based criterion, using the compound angle as a case study. The results show that the influence of compound angle on normalized cycle efficiency reaches 1.10 %. The maximum normalized cycle efficiency occurs when the aerodynamic loss is minimized, corresponding to a compound angle of 0°. This value is 0.43 % higher than that obtained at the compound angle with the minimum bleeding ratio. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating aerodynamic loss in film cooling design.
Suggested Citation
Qiu, Tian & Ma, Qinglin & Yuan, Qiyu & Gao, Ziqiang & Liu, Peng & Liu, Chuankai & Ding, Shuiting & Gan, Chenyu & Zhao, Wei, 2025.
"Integrating aerodynamic loss into film cooling performance evaluation from a thermodynamic cycle perspective: a case study in compound angle design,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:340:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225049801
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.139338
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:340:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225049801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.