IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v340y2025ics036054422504887x.html

Cluster-wise deep learning framework for scenario-adaptive energy consumption and productivity prediction of cutter suction dredger

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Yong
  • Ren, Qiubing
  • Li, Mingchao
  • Tian, Huijing
  • Qin, Liang
  • Wu, Dianchun

Abstract

In the construction process under complex geological conditions, accurately real-time predict energy consumption and productivity of cutter suction dredger (CSD) is a crucial foundation for promoting the realization of low-carbon emission reduction goals in the dredging field. This paper proposes a data-driven framework that combines unsupervised clustering with multivariate time series prediction to achieve scenario-adaptive predictions of CSD construction performance. First, a feature selection strategy based on non-linear mutual information and linear correlation is used to identify key parameters from 256-dimensional construction data strongly related to energy consumption and productivity. Next, K-means clustering is applied to the two-dimensional data of cutter cutting torque and winch swing torque. This analysis defines different dredging difficulty scales, enabling classification and mapping various dredging scenarios. Finally, a multi-output prediction model named Dynamic ProbSparse TimesNet (DPSTimesNet) is developed, embedding a sliding window Fast Fourier Transform dynamic weight adjustment mechanism and integrating ProbSparse self-attention into TimesNet architecture. The framework performance is validated using construction data from Tian Jing Hao CSD in the Pinglu Canal project. Results show that the clustering closely correlates with cutter depth and geological data, with four dredging scenarios distinguished objectively. The DPSTimesNet model accurately predicts energy consumption and productivity across different scenarios, achieving R2 values above 0.9824 and 0.9704, respectively, outperforming baseline models. Compared to traditional global modeling methods, this framework dynamically adjusts the prediction strategies based on geological conditions, demonstrating excellent scenario adaptability. Operators can enhance energy efficiency and reduce construction costs by adjusting key control parameters based on real-time feedback from energy consumption and productivity predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Yong & Ren, Qiubing & Li, Mingchao & Tian, Huijing & Qin, Liang & Wu, Dianchun, 2025. "Cluster-wise deep learning framework for scenario-adaptive energy consumption and productivity prediction of cutter suction dredger," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:340:y:2025:i:c:s036054422504887x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.139245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422504887X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.139245?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sekhar, Charan & Dahiya, Ratna, 2023. "Robust framework based on hybrid deep learning approach for short term load forecasting of building electricity demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    2. Diebold, Francis X & Mariano, Roberto S, 2002. "Comparing Predictive Accuracy," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(1), pages 134-144, January.
    3. Shang, Gang & Xu, Liyun & Tian, Jinzhu & Cai, Dongwei & Xu, Zhun & Zhou, Zhuo, 2023. "A real-time green construction optimization strategy for engineering vessels considering fuel consumption and productivity: A case study on a cutter suction dredger," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    4. Harvey, David & Leybourne, Stephen & Newbold, Paul, 1997. "Testing the equality of prediction mean squared errors," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 281-291, June.
    5. Gong, Jianqiang & Qu, Zhiguo & Zhu, Zhenle & Xu, Hongtao, 2025. "Parallel TimesNet-BiLSTM model for ultra-short-term photovoltaic power forecasting using STL decomposition and auto-tuning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    6. Chang, Yuanhong & Li, Fudong & Chen, Jinglong & Liu, Yulang & Li, Zipeng, 2022. "Efficient temporal flow Transformer accompanied with multi-head probsparse self-attention mechanism for remaining useful life prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kelly Burns & Imad Moosa, 2017. "Demystifying the Meese–Rogoff puzzle: structural breaks or measures of forecasting accuracy?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(48), pages 4897-4910, October.
    2. Carlo Altavilla & Paul De Grauwe, 2010. "Forecasting and combining competing models of exchange rate determination," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(27), pages 3455-3480.
    3. Xiaojie Xu, 2017. "The rolling causal structure between the Chinese stock index and futures," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 31(4), pages 491-509, November.
    4. Daniel Buncic, 2012. "Understanding forecast failure of ESTAR models of real exchange rates," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 399-426, August.
    5. Scott Brave & R. Andrew Butters & Alejandro Justiniano, 2016. "Forecasting Economic Activity with Mixed Frequency Bayesian VARs," Working Paper Series WP-2016-5, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    6. Keen Meng Choy & Hwee Kwan Chow, 2004. "Forecasting the Global Electronics Cycle with Leading Indicators: A VAR Approach," Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings 223, Econometric Society.
    7. Ard H.J. den Reijer, 2005. "Forecasting Dutch GDP using Large Scale Factor Models," DNB Working Papers 028, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    8. Andrea Carriero & Todd E. Clark & Massimiliano Marcellino, 2015. "Realtime nowcasting with a Bayesian mixed frequency model with stochastic volatility," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 178(4), pages 837-862, October.
    9. Chuliá, Helena & Garrón, Ignacio & Uribe, Jorge M., 2024. "Daily growth at risk: Financial or real drivers? The answer is not always the same," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 762-776.
    10. Mehmet Balcilar & Rangan Gupta & Stephen M. Miller, 2015. "The out-of-sample forecasting performance of nonlinear models of regional housing prices in the US," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(22), pages 2259-2277, May.
    11. Aastveit, Knut Are & Trovik, Tørres, 2014. "Estimating the output gap in real time: A factor model approach," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 180-193.
    12. Jonathan Berrisch & Florian Ziel, 2023. "Multivariate Probabilistic CRPS Learning with an Application to Day-Ahead Electricity Prices," Papers 2303.10019, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    13. Dima, Bogdan & Dima, Ştefana Maria & Ioan, Roxana, 2025. "The short-run impact of investor expectations’ past volatility on current predictions: The case of VIX," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    14. Johanna Posch & Fabio Rumler, 2015. "Semi‐Structural Forecasting of UK Inflation Based on the Hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 145-162, March.
    15. Ling Tang & Chengyuan Zhang & Tingfei Li & Ling Li, 2021. "A novel BEMD-based method for forecasting tourist volume with search engine data," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(5), pages 1015-1038, August.
    16. Sucarrat, Genaro, 2009. "Forecast Evaluation of Explanatory Models of Financial Variability," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy, vol. 3, pages 1-33.
    17. Peter Carr & Liuren Wu, 2023. "Decomposing Long Bond Returns: A Decentralized Theory," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 27(3), pages 997-1026.
    18. Massimiliano Marzo & Paolo Zagaglia, 2010. "Volatility forecasting for crude oil futures," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(16), pages 1587-1599.
    19. Costantini, Mauro & Pappalardo, Carmine, 2010. "A hierarchical procedure for the combination of forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 725-743, October.
    20. Marie Bessec & Julien Fouquau & Sophie Meritet, 2016. "Forecasting electricity spot prices using time-series models with a double temporal segmentation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 361-378, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:340:y:2025:i:c:s036054422504887x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.