IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v340y2025ics0360544225048182.html

Evaluating alternative methanol fuel cell vehicles based on life cycle assessment with system dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Bangshun
  • Hao, Qianwen
  • Zhang, Wei
  • Li, Wenbo
  • Li, Chengjiang

Abstract

China operates as a leading worldwide methanol manufacturer while working to develop multiple technologies for methanol fuel cell vehicle (MFCV) production. However, the overall performance of different methanol production routes in terms of resources, environment and economy is still unclear. The study creates a Resource-Environment-Economy (REE) model which combines Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) with system dynamics to evaluate three methanol production methods for MFCVs from 2022 through 2035 under different renewable energy integration levels. The biomass-to-methanol (BTMV) process requires the least amount of life cycle energy at 34.11 % less than CO2-to-methanol (CO2MV) and 22.11 % less than coal-to-methanol (CTMV). The fuel cycle of CO2MV produces negative emissions. The three production methods demonstrate distinct water consumption patterns which create problems when trying to distribute water resources throughout China. The economic assessment demonstrates that increased renewable energy usage leads to decreased life cycle expenses for both CO2MV and CTMV. The BTMV method demonstrates superior performance in all evaluation criteria when renewable energy usage reaches its highest point. The framework enables organizations to make investment choices and develop decarbonization plans through its standardized evaluation system.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Bangshun & Hao, Qianwen & Zhang, Wei & Li, Wenbo & Li, Chengjiang, 2025. "Evaluating alternative methanol fuel cell vehicles based on life cycle assessment with system dynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:340:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225048182
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.139176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225048182
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.139176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Zhixue & Li, Hui & Zhang, Hongcai, 2025. "A power-to-methanol-based chemical industry system-aided decarbonization approach for power distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
    2. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Jing, You-Yin & Zhang, Chun-Fa & Zhao, Jun-Hong, 2009. "Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2263-2278, December.
    3. Cai, Bowen & Liu, Yingqi, 2025. "Automotive industry development versus environment and policy:An integration of system dynamics and life cycle assessment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Anetjärvi, Eemeli & Vakkilainen, Esa & Melin, Kristian, 2023. "Benefits of hybrid production of e-methanol in connection with biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    5. Chengjiang Li & Tingwen Jia & Shiyuan Wang & Xiaolin Wang & Michael Negnevitsky & Honglei Wang & Yujie Hu & Weibin Xu & Na Zhou & Gang Zhao, 2023. "Methanol Vehicles in China: A Review from a Policy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Jay W. Forrester, 2016. "Learning through System Dynamics as Preparation for the 21st Century," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 32(3-4), pages 187-203, July.
    7. Tang, Xueyang & Cai, Xiaopei & Wang, Yuqi & Wang, Pu & Yang, Fei, 2025. "Advanced VTSDREF for vehicle-turnout system dynamic reliability analysis: Integration of hybrid deep learning and adaptive probability density evolution method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    8. Kwon, Tae-hyeong, 2012. "Strategic niche management of alternative fuel vehicles: A system dynamics model of the policy effect," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(9), pages 1672-1680.
    9. Ahmed I. Osman & Mahmoud Nasr & A. R. Mohamed & Amal Abdelhaleem & Ali Ayati & Mohamed Farghali & Ala'a H. Al‐Muhtaseb & Ahmed S. Al‐Fatesh & David W. Rooney, 2024. "Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production, storage, and utilization toward sustainability," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), May.
    10. Diakoulaki, D. & Karangelis, F., 2007. "Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis of alternative scenarios for the power generation sector in Greece," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 716-727, May.
    11. Troldborg, Mads & Heslop, Simon & Hough, Rupert L., 2014. "Assessing the sustainability of renewable energy technologies using multi-criteria analysis: Suitability of approach for national-scale assessments and associated uncertainties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1173-1184.
    12. Yisong Chen & Xu Hu & Jiahui Liu, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of Fuel Cell Vehicles Considering the Detailed Vehicle Components: Comparison and Scenario Analysis in China Based on Different Hydrogen Production Schemes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Togun, Hussein & Basem, Ali & Abdulrazzaq, Tuqa & Biswas, Nirmalendu & Abed, Azher M. & dhabab, Jameel M. & Chattopadhyay, Anirban & Slimi, Khalifa & Paul, Dipankar & Barmavatu, Praveen & Chrouda, Ama, 2025. "Development and comparative analysis between battery electric vehicles (BEV) and fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    14. Francesca Verones & Stefanie Hellweg & Assumpció Antón & Ligia B. Azevedo & Abhishek Chaudhary & Nuno Cosme & Stefano Cucurachi & Laura de Baan & Yan Dong & Peter Fantke & Laura Golsteijn & Michael Ha, 2020. "LC‐IMPACT: A regionalized life cycle damage assessment method," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1201-1219, December.
    15. Li, Chengjiang & Hao, Qianwen & Zhang, Wei & Wang, Shiyuan & Yang, Jing, 2025. "Development strategies for green hydrogen, green ammonia, and green methanol in transportation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    16. Chen, Quanwei & Lai, Xin & Chen, Junjie & Huang, Yunfeng & Guo, Yi & Wang, Yanan & Han, Xuebing & Lu, Languang & Sun, Yuedong & Ouyang, Minggao & Zheng, Yuejiu, 2024. "A critical comparison of LCA calculation models for the power lithium-ion battery in electric vehicles during use-phase," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    17. Zhan, Weipeng & Wang, Zhenpo & Deng, Junjun & Liu, Peng & Cui, Dingsong, 2024. "Integrating system dynamics and agent-based modeling: A data-driven framework for predicting electric vehicle market penetration and GHG emissions reduction under various incentives scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    18. David R. Keith & Jeroen J.R. Struben & Sergey Naumov, 2020. "The Diffusion of Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Generalised Model and Future Research Agenda," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 260-277, October.
    19. Yuan, Xudong & Lee, Lien-Chieh & Zhu, Yi & Wang, Yuan & Zhang, Hongyu & Zheng, Han & Chicaiza-Ortiz, Cristhian & Liu, Ziguo, 2025. "Unveiling the inequality and embodied carbon emissions of China's battery electric vehicles across life cycles by using a MRIO-based LCA model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sellak, Hamza & Ouhbi, Brahim & Frikh, Bouchra & Palomares, Iván, 2017. "Towards next-generation energy planning decision-making: An expert-based framework for intelligent decision support," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1544-1577.
    2. Khishtandar, Soheila & Zandieh, Mostafa & Dorri, Behrouz, 2017. "A multi criteria decision making framework for sustainability assessment of bioenergy production technologies with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: The case of Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1130-1145.
    3. Mostafa Shaaban & Jürgen Scheffran & Jürgen Böhner & Mohamed S. Elsobki, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation Technologies in Egypt Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    4. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    5. Baležentis, Tomas & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2017. "Multi-criteria ranking of energy generation scenarios with Monte Carlo simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 862-871.
    6. Fang, Hong & Wang, Xu & Song, Wenyan, 2020. "Technology selection for photovoltaic cell from sustainability perspective: An integrated approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1029-1041.
    7. Dragan Pamučar & Fatih Ecer & Goran Cirovic & Melfi A. Arlasheedi, 2020. "Application of Improved Best Worst Method (BWM) in Real-World Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Feng, Jianghong & Chen, Feng, 2025. "A recycling mechanism for used electric vehicle batteries by integrating affine maximizer auction and fuzzy axiomatic design method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    9. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Bettahar, Samir & Benbouziane, Mohamed, 2018. "Optimizing renewable energy portfolios under uncertainty: A multi-segment fuzzy goal programming approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 540-552.
    10. Urošević, Branka Gvozdenac & Marinović, Budimirka, 2021. "Ranking construction of small hydro power plants using multi-criteria decision analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1174-1183.
    11. Rekha Guchhait & Biswajit Sarkar, 2023. "Increasing Growth of Renewable Energy: A State of Art," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-29, March.
    12. Li, Tao & Li, Ang & Guo, Xiaopeng, 2020. "The sustainable development-oriented development and utilization of renewable energy industry——A comprehensive analysis of MCDM methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    13. Rivero-Iglesias, Jose M. & Puente, Javier & Fernandez, Isabel & León, Omar, 2023. "Integrated model for the assessment of power generation alternatives through analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy inference system. Case study of Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 563-581.
    14. Doukas, Haris, 2013. "Modelling of linguistic variables in multicriteria energy policy support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 227-238.
    15. Delponte, Ilaria & Pittaluga, Ilaria & Schenone, Corrado, 2017. "Monitoring and evaluation of Sustainable Energy Action Plan: Practice and perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 9-17.
    16. Mardani, Abbas & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Khalifah, Zainab & Zakuan, Norhayati & Jusoh, Ahmad & Nor, Khalil Md & Khoshnoudi, Masoumeh, 2017. "A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 216-256.
    17. Magdalena Krysiak & Aldona Kluczek, 2021. "A Multifaceted Challenge to Enhance Multicriteria Decision Support for Energy Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Mahsa Montajabiha, 2016. "An Extended PROMETHE II Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Technique Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic for Sustainable Energy Planning," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 221-244, March.
    19. Mostafa Shaaban & Jürgen Scheffran & Jürgen Böhner & Mohamed S. Elsobki, 2019. "A Dynamic Sustainability Analysis of Energy Landscapes in Egypt: A Spatial Agent-Based Model Combined with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 22(1), pages 1-4.
    20. Colla, Martin & Ioannou, Anastasia & Falcone, Gioia, 2020. "Critical review of competitiveness indicators for energy projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:340:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225048182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.