IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v340y2025ics0360544225048157.html

An innovative DMAIC and response surface methodology framework for optimizing carbon xerogel synthesis in proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigues, Douglas Miranda
  • Rodríguez, Elias Carlos Aguirre
  • Marins, Fernando Augusto Silva
  • de Oliveira, Isaías
  • Silva, Messias Borges
  • da Silva, Aneirson Francisco

Abstract

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells require catalytic supports with high surface area and controllable surface chemistry to ensure catalyst dispersion, stability, and durability. This study presents an integrated framework combining Define–Measure–Analyze–Improve–Control (DMAIC), Design of Experiments, and Response Surface Methodology to optimize carbon xerogel synthesis for membrane electrode assembly supports in a public research environment. A Box–Behnken design with three factors at three levels (15 runs) evaluated (i) acid type in the sol–gel step, (ii) carbonization temperature (900–1100 °C), and (iii) carbonization time (10–30 min). Two critical-to-quality responses were measured: Raman ID/IG ratio (defect density/functionalization) and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller specific surface area. Second-order regression models showed strong statistical performance and were embedded in a weighted desirability function solved with the Generalized Reduced Gradient algorithm for multi-response optimization. Optimal conditions consistently involved sulfuric acid, temperatures around 970–1020 °C, and 30 min, jointly improving Raman ID/IG ratio and surface area. Confirmation experiments under three representative scenarios yielded values within two-sided 95% prediction intervals, demonstrating model predictability and process reproducibility. The DMAIC cycle concluded with standard operating procedures for knowledge transfer and control. Limitations include the restricted design space and the absence of electrochemical durability and stack-level validation. Even so, the framework proved effective and transferable, aligning optimization with traceability and robustness needs in fuel cell research and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigues, Douglas Miranda & Rodríguez, Elias Carlos Aguirre & Marins, Fernando Augusto Silva & de Oliveira, Isaías & Silva, Messias Borges & da Silva, Aneirson Francisco, 2025. "An innovative DMAIC and response surface methodology framework for optimizing carbon xerogel synthesis in proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:340:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225048157
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.139173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225048157
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.139173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dellino, Gabriella & Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Meloni, Carlo, 2010. "Robust optimization in simulation: Taguchi and Response Surface Methodology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 52-59, May.
    2. Sharifi, Shima & Rahimi, Rahbar & Mohebbi-Kalhori, Davod & Colpan, C. Ozgur, 2020. "Coupled computational fluid dynamics-response surface methodology to optimize direct methanol fuel cell performance for greener energy generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Marina Corral Bobadilla & Rubén Lostado Lorza & Rubén Escribano García & Fátima Somovilla Gómez & Eliseo P. Vergara González, 2017. "An Improvement in Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil by Applying Thought Multi-Response Surface Methodology Using Desirability Functions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Roy, Dibyendu, 2023. "Multi-objective optimization of biomass gasification based combined heat and power system employing molten carbonate fuel cell and externally fired gas turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    5. Vishal Singh Patyal & Sachin Modgil & Maddulety Koilakuntla, 2020. "Application of Six Sigma methodology in an Indian chemical company," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 70(2), pages 350-375, April.
    6. Sadeghi, Delnia & Ahmadi, Seyed Ehsan & Amiri, Nima & Satinder, & Marzband, Mousa & Abusorrah, Abdullah & Rawa, Muhyaddin, 2022. "Designing, optimizing and comparing distributed generation technologies as a substitute system for reducing life cycle costs, CO2 emissions, and power losses in residential buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José María Encinar & Sergio Nogales & Juan Félix González, 2020. "The effect of BHA on oxidative stability of biodiesel from different sources," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(6), pages 1193-1201, December.
    2. Dellino, Gabriella & Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Meloni, Carlo, 2010. "Robust optimization in simulation: Taguchi and Response Surface Methodology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 52-59, May.
    3. Li, Xiang & Sun, Fan & Cai, Hu & Xue, Fei & Xin, Yu & Hong, Hui, 2026. "Bi-level optimization of integrated PV-storage and by-product hydrogen systems for sustainable chlor-alkali industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    4. Fang, Shuo & Song, Nan & Liu, Yuntao & Zhao, Chunhui & Wang, Ying, 2024. "Comprehensive energy conversion efficiency analysis of micro direct methanol fuel cell stack based on polarization theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    5. Pourmohammadi, Pardis & Saif, Ahmed, 2023. "Robust metamodel-based simulation-optimization approaches for designing hybrid renewable energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    6. Pourali, Mostafa & Esfahani, Javad Abolfazli, 2022. "Performance analysis of a micro-scale integrated hydrogen production system by analytical approach, machine learning, and response surface methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    7. Laureano Costarrosa & David Eduardo Leiva-Candia & Antonio José Cubero-Atienza & Juan José Ruiz & M. Pilar Dorado, 2018. "Optimization of the Transesterification of Waste Cooking Oil with Mg-Al Hydrotalcite Using Response Surface Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-9, January.
    8. Ke, Yuzhi & Zhang, Baotong & Bai, Yafeng & Yuan, Wei & Li, Jinguang & Liu, Ziang & Su, Xiaoqing & Zhang, Shiwei & Ding, Xinrui & Wan, Zhenping & Tang, Yong & Zhou, Feikun, 2023. "Bubble-derived contour regeneration of flow channel by in situ tracking for direct methanol fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    9. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 2008. "Design of Experiments : An Overview," Discussion Paper 2008-70, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. Zhang, Rongji & Cao, Jiamu & Wang, Weiqi & Zhou, Jing & Chen, Junyu & Chen, Liang & Chen, Weiping & Zhang, Yufeng, 2023. "An improved strategy of passive micro direct methanol fuel cell: Mass transport mechanism optimization dominated by a single hydrophilic layer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    11. Lu, M.L. & Sun, Y.J. & Kokogiannakis, G. & Ma, Z.J., 2024. "Design of flexible energy systems for nearly/net zero energy buildings under uncertainty characteristics: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    12. Elkholy, M.H. & Senjyu, Tomonobu & Elymany, Mahmoud & Gamil, Mahmoud M. & Talaat, M. & Masrur, Hasan & Ueda, Soichiro & Lotfy, Mohammed Elsayed, 2024. "Optimal resilient operation and sustainable power management within an autonomous residential microgrid using African vultures optimization algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    13. Sergio Nogales-Delgado & José María Encinar & Juan Félix González, 2019. "Safflower Biodiesel: Improvement of its Oxidative Stability by Using BHA and TBHQ," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, May.
    14. Tavakoli, Navid & Pourfayaz, Fathollah & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2025. "Tri-optimization of cost, power and efficiency of a waste biomass gasification integrated with a molten carbonate fuel cell by a combined approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    15. Marina Corral Bobadilla & Roberto Fernández Martínez & Rubén Lostado Lorza & Fátima Somovilla Gómez & Eliseo P. Vergara González, 2018. "Optimizing Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil Using Genetic Algorithm-Based Support Vector Machines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Miranda, Rafael de Carvalho & Montevechi, José Arnaldo Barra & da Silva, Aneirson Francisco & Marins, Fernando Augusto Silva, 2017. "Increasing the efficiency in integer simulation optimization: Reducing the search space through data envelopment analysis and orthogonal arrays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 673-681.
    17. Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 2015. "Response Surface Methodology," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Michael C Fu (ed.), Handbook of Simulation Optimization, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 81-104, Springer.
    18. Julien Marzat & Eric Walter & Hélène Piet-Lahanier, 2013. "Worst-case global optimization of black-box functions through Kriging and relaxation," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 707-727, April.
    19. Denoyel, Victoire & Alfandari, Laurent & Thiele, Aurélie, 2017. "Optimizing healthcare network design under reference pricing and parameter uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 996-1006.
    20. Cai, Benan & Wang, Rong & Gao, Ruihang & Che, Xunjian & Zhang, Zhongnong & Wang, Haijun & Cai, Weihua, 2025. "Performance analysis and multi-objective optimization of a combined seawater desalination and power system based on high-temperature PEMFC and externally fired gas turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:340:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225048157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.