Author
Listed:
- Shabruhi Mishamandani, Arian
- Asfand, Faisal
- Fadlallah, Sulaiman O.
Abstract
As the world struggles with climate change, biogas produced via anaerobic digestion (AD) offers a promising sustainable energy solution. While numerous studies have explored integrating AD with heat-to-power generation systems, a key gap remains in understanding how biomass affects overall system performance. In particular, through comprehensive energy, exergy, economy, and environmental (4E) assessments which are essential for a more accurate system modelling, and system optimization. To address this gap, this research evaluated five biogas-powered configurations: gas turbine cycle (GT), organic Rankine cycle (ORC), ORC with an internal regenerator (ORC-IG), supercritical carbon dioxide (SCO2), and SCO2 with a recuperator (SCO2-R). These systems were assessed and compared based on energy and exergy efficiency, total annual cost, CO2 emissions, and CO2 equivalent emission. Among them, the GT-SCO2-R system delivered the best overall performance, achieving the highest thermal and exergy efficiencies (44.33% and 43.0%, respectively), maximum net power output (11,078 kW), the shortest payback period (1.72 years), and the greatest CO2 emissions reduction (13,515 tCO2/year). It also compares alternative waste management methods and outlines critical factors for policymakers. The analysis also revealed that the digestion plant caused the highest exergy destruction, indicating the need for technological improvements at this stage. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of biogas system performance and provides valuable insights into design optimization. It also compares alternative waste management methods and outlines critical factors for policymakers. The findings support the strategic advancement of biogas as a viable path toward sustainable energy production.
Suggested Citation
Shabruhi Mishamandani, Arian & Asfand, Faisal & Fadlallah, Sulaiman O., 2025.
"Energetic, exergetic, economic and environmental (4E) assessment of power cycles integrated with anaerobic digester,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:340:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225047115
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.139069
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:340:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225047115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.