Author
Listed:
- Yang, Huijie
- Qi, Shaobo
- Hu, Qianran
- Wang, Jizhe
- Qian, Xinming
- Yuan, Mengqi
- Li, Pengliang
Abstract
Based on typical residence, a full-scale large space explosion test platform of 280.35 m3 was built, and an equal-scale physical model was established. The explosion characteristics and structural failure of natural gas in residence under different ignition positions were investigated by experiment and simulation. Results indicated the flame venting followed a sequence from the ignition room window to the bathroom window or entrance door and finally to the window of the most adjacent room for different ignition positions. Compared with igniting in the small space, the peak temperature and peak overpressure of the indoor explosion showed an increasing trend when igniting in the large space. The peak flame temperature at ignition in the dining room was the highest, reaching 2492.75 K, which was 3.75 % higher than the lowest peak flame temperature. When igniting in the living room, the time required to reach injure Level IV in the residence was the longest, which was 35.21 % higher than that when igniting in the bathroom. In addition, the explosion intensity (explosion peak overpressure) generated by different ignition positions was as follows: living room and dining room > bedroom > bathroom. Compared with igniting in the dining room, the velocity and mass proportion of glass fragments were higher when igniting in the bathroom, which were 32.06 m/s and 53.12 % respectively. Under the effect of overpressure difference, the masonry wall in the residence opened from the small space to the large space.
Suggested Citation
Yang, Huijie & Qi, Shaobo & Hu, Qianran & Wang, Jizhe & Qian, Xinming & Yuan, Mengqi & Li, Pengliang, 2025.
"Natural gas explosion characteristics and structural failures in typical residence under different ignition positions,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225042458
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138603
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225042458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.