Author
Listed:
- Zhang, Zezhou
- Sang, Yupeng
- Liu, Shuai
- Kai, Tong
- Song, Chunfeng
Abstract
Integrating microalgae cultivation with carbon capture from coal-fired power plants is a promising decarbonization strategy, but its viability is often hindered by the high energy penalty of conventional CO2 capture processes. This study introduces and evaluates a novel hybrid chemical absorption–microalgae conversion (CAMC) process designed to overcome this barrier. The key innovation of the CAMC route is the replacement of the energy-intensive thermal desorption unit with the microalgae cultivation system itself, enabling simultaneous solvent regeneration and carbon bio-fixation. To quantify its advantages, the CAMC process was benchmarked against two conventional pathways for a 500 MW coal-fired power plant: (i) post-combustion chemical absorption coupled with cultivation, and (ii) direct flue gas injection. The results demonstrate that the CAMC hybrid process, particularly when paired with open pond systems, is the superior pathway. It achieved a low energy intensity (2.31 MJ/kg biomass), a highly favorable economic cost (0.69 USD/kg biomass), ad substantial net-negative emissions (−345 kg CO2-eq/ton biomass). This performance significantly surpassed the conventional capture pathway, which suffered from a high carbon footprint, and proved more cost-effective and productive than the direct flue gas approach. To enable large-scale deployment, future efforts should prioritize enhancing algal productivity and integrating renewable energy and low-carbon nitrogen sources. In summary, the CAMC process represents a technically viable and economically promising innovation capable of achieving deep decarbonization in fossil-based power generation.
Suggested Citation
Zhang, Zezhou & Sang, Yupeng & Liu, Shuai & Kai, Tong & Song, Chunfeng, 2025.
"Comparative techno-economic and life cycle assessment of microalgae-based CO2 capture technologies for coal-fired power plants under different carbon supply modes,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225042306
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138588
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225042306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.