IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v336y2025ics0360544225041477.html

Machine learning based prediction for China's household cooking energy transition under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Dong
  • Geng, Yong
  • Li, Meng

Abstract

Promoting clean cooking fuels is one target of sustainable development goal 7 (SDG7). China is a populous developing country striving for carbon neutrality, it is therefore critical for China to achieve household cooking energy transition (HCET). This study characterizes the spatio-temporal evolution features of China's HCET, identify the key HCET drivers for the period of 2010–2022, and forecasts future HCET progress by 2030 (SDG target year) and 2060 (China's carbon neutrality target year) under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) scenarios by applying machine learning models. The results show that 31.43 % of Chinese households transitioned from solid fuels to clean energy as their primary cooking energy source. However, such HCET progress presents regional disparity, with some provinces within China's southwestern, northwestern, and central regions lagging behind. Among different machine learning algorithms, the XGBoost model achieves superior predictive performance than others. Household per capita income and gas accessibility rate are key drivers of HCET. The probability of China's HCET would reach up to 89.20 % in 2030 and 93.28 % in 2060. Among all the scenarios, the SSP1 (Sustainability) scenario is most suitable for China's HCET, while the SSP2 scenario is close to the SSP1. The forecast results indicate that China's southwestern region will continue to be backward in their HCET progress. Finally, targeted policy recommendations (including enhance energy infrastructure, ensure clean energy access for low-income households, and encourage HCET behaviors) are proposed to further promote the HCET progress in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Dong & Geng, Yong & Li, Meng, 2025. "Machine learning based prediction for China's household cooking energy transition under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225041477
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225041477
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.138505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliver Stoner & Gavin Shaddick & Theo Economou & Sophie Gumy & Jessica Lewis & Itzel Lucio & Giulia Ruggeri & Heather Adair‐Rohani, 2020. "Global household energy model: a multivariate hierarchical approach to estimating trends in the use of polluting and clean fuels for cooking," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(4), pages 815-839, August.
    2. Yang, Aoxi & Wang, Yahui, 2023. "Transition of household cooking energy in China since the 1980s," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Paudel, Uttam & Khatri, Umesh & Pant, Krishna Prasad, 2018. "Understanding the determinants of household cooking fuel choice in Afghanistan: A multinomial logit estimation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 55-62.
    4. S. Tao & M. Y. Ru & W. Du & X. Zhu & Q. R. Zhong & B. G. Li & G. F. Shen & X. L. Pan & W. J. Meng & Y. L. Chen & H. Z. Shen & N. Lin & S. Su & S. J. Zhuo & T. B. Huang & Y. Xu & X. Yun & J. F. Liu & X, 2018. "Quantifying the rural residential energy transition in China from 1992 to 2012 through a representative national survey," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(7), pages 567-573, July.
    5. Ellison Carter & Li Yan & Yu Fu & Brian Robinson & Frank Kelly & Paul Elliott & Yangfeng Wu & Liancheng Zhao & Majid Ezzati & Xudong Yang & Queenie Chan & Jill Baumgartner, 2020. "Household transitions to clean energy in a multiprovincial cohort study in China," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(1), pages 42-50, January.
    6. Oliver Stoner & Jessica Lewis & Itzel Lucio Martínez & Sophie Gumy & Theo Economou & Heather Adair-Rohani, 2021. "Household cooking fuel estimates at global and country level for 1990 to 2030," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    7. Alem, Yonas & Beyene, Abebe D. & Köhlin, Gunnar & Mekonnen, Alemu, 2016. "Modeling household cooking fuel choice: A panel multinomial logit approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 129-137.
    8. Hausman, Jerry & McFadden, Daniel, 1984. "Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(5), pages 1219-1240, September.
    9. Elmar Kriegler & Jae Edmonds & Stéphane Hallegatte & Kristie Ebi & Tom Kram & Keywan Riahi & Harald Winkler & Detlef Vuuren, 2014. "A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 401-414, February.
    10. McLean, Elena V. & Bagchi-Sen, Sharmistha & Atkinson, John D. & Ravenscroft, Julia & Hewner, Sharon & Schindel, Alexandra, 2019. "Country-level analysis of household fuel transitions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 267-280.
    11. Shi, Zhengyu & Wu, Libo & Zhou, Yang, 2023. "Predicting household energy consumption in an aging society," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    12. Brian O’Neill & Elmar Kriegler & Keywan Riahi & Kristie Ebi & Stephane Hallegatte & Timothy Carter & Ritu Mathur & Detlef Vuuren, 2014. "A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 387-400, February.
    13. Shonali Pachauri & Miguel Poblete-Cazenave & Arda Aktas & Matthew J. Gidden, 2021. "Access to clean cooking services in energy and emission scenarios after COVID-19," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1067-1076, November.
    14. Sunil Mani & Abhishek Jain & Saurabh Tripathi & Carlos F. Gould, 2020. "The drivers of sustained use of liquified petroleum gas in India," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(6), pages 450-457, June.
    15. Richard H. Moss & Jae A. Edmonds & Kathy A. Hibbard & Martin R. Manning & Steven K. Rose & Detlef P. van Vuuren & Timothy R. Carter & Seita Emori & Mikiko Kainuma & Tom Kram & Gerald A. Meehl & John F, 2010. "The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment," Nature, Nature, vol. 463(7282), pages 747-756, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Liwen & Dong, Hongwei & Xiao, Chiwei & Feng, Zhiming & Yan, Jianzhong, 2024. "Energy consumption, structural transformation and related carbon dioxide emissions of rural households on the Tibetan plateau," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    2. Liu, Yuan & Chen, Jiahui & Zhao, Lutao & Liao, Hua, 2023. "Rural photovoltaic projects substantially prompt household energy transition: Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Magalhães Filho, L.N.L. & Roebeling, P.C. & Costa, L.F.C. & de Lima, L.T., 2022. "Ecosystem services values at risk in the Atlantic coastal zone due to sea-level rise and socioeconomic development," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Zhang, Huijin & Hu, Wenbo, 2025. "Unveiling the reality of carbon reduction: Is the Paris Agreement turning the world green or just painting it green?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Sands, Ronald D. & Malcolm, Scott A. & Suttles, Shellye A. & Marshall, Elizabeth, 2017. "Dedicated Energy Crops and Competition for Agricultural Land," Economic Research Report 252445, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Miftakhova, Alena & Judd, Kenneth L. & Lontzek, Thomas S. & Schmedders, Karl, 2020. "Statistical approximation of high-dimensional climate models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 214(1), pages 67-80.
    7. Wu, Shu & Wang, Yiluo, 2024. "The impact of land-use policy on household energy transition: Evidence from China's conversion of cropland to forestland program," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    8. Kemp-Benedict, Eric & Carlsen, Henrik & Kartha, Sivan, 2019. "Large-scale scenarios as ‘boundary conditions’: A cross-impact balance simulated annealing (CIBSA) approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 55-63.
    9. Halvard Buhaug & Jonas Vestby, 2019. "On Growth Projections in the Shared SocioeconomicPathways," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(4), pages 118-132, November.
    10. Skea, Jim & van Diemen, Renée & Portugal-Pereira, Joana & Khourdajie, Alaa Al, 2021. "Outlooks, explorations and normative scenarios: Approaches to global energy futures compared," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Simona Pedde & Kasper Kok & Eric Kemp-Benedict & Oliver Johnson & Henrik Carlsen & Carole Green & Sara Talebian & Stefan Fagerström & Xiaoshi Xing, 2025. "Emerging regional perspectives of global climate change scenarios: a systematic review," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(6), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Angel Manuel Benitez Rodriguez & Ian Michael Trotter, 2019. "Climate change scenarios for Paraguayan power demand 2017–2050," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 425-445, October.
    13. Jaime, Mónica M. & Chávez, Carlos & Gómez, Walter, 2020. "Fuel choices and fuelwood use for residential heating and cooking in urban areas of central-southern Chile: The role of prices, income, and the availability of energy sources and technology," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    14. Sonia Quiroga & Cristina Suárez & Juan Diego Solís & Pablo Martínez-Juárez & Juan Fernández-Manjarrés, 2025. "Is coffee transition to cocoa a doubtful adaptation strategy for smallholders in Mesoamerica?," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Athanasios Thomas Vafeidis & Lena Reimann & Gerald Jan Ellen & Gunnel Goransson & Gerben Koers & Lisa Van Well & Bente Vollstedt & Maureen Tsakiris & Amy Oen, 2024. "Harmonizing the Development of Local Socioeconomic Scenarios: A Participatory Downscaling Approach Applied in Four European Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Hans van Meijl & Petr Havlik & Hermann Lotze-Campen & Elke Stehfest & Peter Witzke & Ignacio Perez Dominguez & Benjamin Bodirsky & Michiel van Dijk & Jonathan Doelman & Thomas Fellmann & Florian Humpe, 2017. "Challenges of Global Agriculture in a Climate Change Context by 2050 (AgCLIM50)," JRC Research Reports JRC106835, Joint Research Centre.
    17. Mier, Mathias & Siala, Kais & Govorukha, Kristina & Mayer, Philip, 2023. "Collaboration, decarbonization, and distributional effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    18. Mason-D'Croz, Daniel & Sulser, Timothy B. & Wiebe, Keith & Rosegrant, Mark W. & Lowder, Sarah K. & Nin-Pratt, Alejandro & Willenbockel, Dirk & Robinson, Sherman & Zhu, Tingju & Cenacchi, Nicola & Duns, 2019. "Agricultural investments and hunger in Africa modeling potential contributions to SDG2 – Zero Hunger," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 38-53.
    19. Liu, Pihui & Han, Chuanfeng & Liu, Xinghua & Teng, Minmin, 2023. "Assessing the effect of nonfarm income on the household cooking energy transition in rural China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    20. Ma, Wanglin & Zheng, Hongyun & Gong, Binlei, 2021. "Household Energy Choice for Cooking: Do Rural Income Growth and Ethnic Difference Play a Role?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314990, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225041477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.