Author
Listed:
- Yuan, Junpeng
- Xie, Shaobo
- Zhang, Fengqi
- Zhang, Qiankun
- Coskun, Serdar
- Fu, Yeyu
- Hu, Bin
Abstract
The depth of discharge (DOD) determines the battery electricity and fuel usage, which is associated with the social cost of the equivalent carbon emission at the well-to-pump (WTP) and pump-to-wheel (PTW) in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs). Higher DOD leads to a significant increase in PHEV operational cost, causing higher energy consumption cost (ECC) and the equivalent cost of battery life loss (ECBLL) due to larger battery packs. Further, the social cost of carbon (SCC) plays a pivotal role in the PHEV energy management strategy (EMS) to maintain global fuel economy. This paper puts forward a multi-objective EMS solution to devise an optimal DOD strategy based on the minimization of the ECC, ECBLL, and SCC over the entire trip. To assess the proposed framework, two types of driving cycles including the developed city bus driving cycle and the standard driving cycle - China heavy-duty commercial vehicle test cycle-bus (CHTC-B) are both utilized for driving simulation studies. The influence of the mileage, power source of battery charge, and vehicular load on optimal DOD are concurrently discussed in the sequel. The results demonstrate that a lower DOD enhances global fuel economy due to the use of less electricity in the PHEV, incorporating the SCC. The results also suggest that the optimal DOD increases with the growing mileage, and the optimal DOD at full load is lower than that in the case of no load under the multi-objective optimization-driven EMS design. Compared with wind power, thermal power tends to choose a lower DOD in the optimal solution of the developed scheme.
Suggested Citation
Yuan, Junpeng & Xie, Shaobo & Zhang, Fengqi & Zhang, Qiankun & Coskun, Serdar & Fu, Yeyu & Hu, Bin, 2025.
"Depth of discharge optimization for energy management of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles considering the social cost of carbon,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225041337
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138491
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225041337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.