IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v336y2025ics0360544225040848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three multi-fidelity data hybrid-driven strategies for multi-objective combustion optimization in coal-fired boilers using POD and XGBoost

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Tianyi
  • Zhong, Wenqi
  • Chen, Xi
  • Zhou, Guanwen
  • Guo, Xiaogang
  • Yu, Li
  • Yang, Zhengze

Abstract

In the context of deep peak shaving and the use of low-quality coal, combustion optimization in coal-fired boilers for safety, efficiency, and low emissions remains crucial. However, due to the lack of real-time monitoring for temperature and chemical species with high resolution, as well as the significant spatial scale differences between optimization objectives, achieving multi-objective combustion optimization that balances safety, efficiency, and low pollution remains a challenge. This study develops a multi-fidelity hybrid modeling framework that couples computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with field measurements to predict high-temperature corrosion and slagging severity, NOx emissions, and exhaust gas temperature. To optimize boiler operating conditions, an enhanced non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) is employed in conjunction with three distinct optimization strategies. The three-dimensional fields of temperature and chemical species are first predicted using proper orthogonal decomposition (POD). Based on these predictions, water wall slagging and corrosion tendencies are predicted with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) and staged evaluation. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models, integrated with k-means clustering, are trained on field data to predict NOx emissions and exhaust gas temperature. Three optimization strategies with an improved NSGA-II and constraint boundary condition are proposed and evaluated for optimization performance and time. High prediction accuracy is achieved for temperature and chemical species via the POD model, and for NOx emissions and exhaust gas temperature using the XGBoost approach. All three optimization strategies effectively reduce NOx emissions and exhaust gas temperature, with Strategy 1 requiring the shortest time, taking 28 s. However, its impact on high-temperature corrosion is limited, with a reduction of 16.1 %. Optimization Strategy 3 provides the best optimization for water wall safety. But it requires predefining a reasonable water wall safety index (WSI) limit range and longer time of 16 min. This approach introduces a novel framework for combustion optimization that simultaneously considers operational safety, thermal efficiency, and pollutant emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Tianyi & Zhong, Wenqi & Chen, Xi & Zhou, Guanwen & Guo, Xiaogang & Yu, Li & Yang, Zhengze, 2025. "Three multi-fidelity data hybrid-driven strategies for multi-objective combustion optimization in coal-fired boilers using POD and XGBoost," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225040848
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225040848
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.138442?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225040848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.