Author
Listed:
- Lei, Yifei
- Botero, Hernan
- Zhang, Riqi
- Zhang, Junhao
Abstract
The acceleration of the solar photovoltaic (PV) technology adoption has been widely recognized as a pivotal pathway for driving the energy transition. However, as Chinese electricity market reforms progress and Feed-in Tariff (FIT) subsidies are phased out, PV projects are increasingly relying on market mechanisms such as carbon trading, green certificate trading, and green power trading to obtain environmental premiums. This shift has made project investment decisions more complex. This study develops a real option (RO) model to examine the optimal investment decisions for PV power generation projects under four different scenarios: baseline, carbon trading, green certificate trading, and green power trading. The influence of key variable fluctuations, including investment costs, operating hours, and electricity prices, on investment decisions is further analysed across these scenarios. We find that, compared to a scenario without any environmental premium, carbon trading increases the project investment value by a factor of 4.48. Green power trading also positively impacts the project investment value, increasing it by 1.47 times, while advancing the optimal investment timing by one year. In contrast, green certificate trading has a relatively limited effect on investment decisions but exerts a more positive influence when green certificate prices rise. Furthermore, investment costs, operating hours, and electricity prices exhibit a threshold effect on investment decisions. Our research findings can assist investors and policymakers in better understanding the critical role of environmental premiums in the energy transition.
Suggested Citation
Lei, Yifei & Botero, Hernan & Zhang, Riqi & Zhang, Junhao, 2025.
"The impact of different environmental premium mechanisms on investment decisions in photovoltaic power generation projects: evidence from China,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225040265
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138384
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225040265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.