IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v336y2025ics0360544225040216.html

A multi-objective NCUC model co-optimizing GHG emissions and market costs using multiple ancillary services in high-renewable systems

Author

Listed:
  • Shoferpour, Alireza
  • Ghaffarpour, Reza
  • Zamanian, Saeid
  • Karimi, Ali

Abstract

The dual challenge of decarbonization and reduction of network operating costs remains a critical focus for power system operators and researchers. This article addresses this challenge by proposing an operational framework that co-optimizes greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction and operational cost (OC) minimization through the simultaneous implementation of day-ahead energy and spinning reserve markets. The framework is formulated as a multi-objective network-constrained unit commitment (NCUC) problem designed for systems with high penetration of wind and solar generation. To achieve these objectives, the study incorporates multiple ancillary services, including demand response (DR), battery energy storage transportation (BEST), and transmission switching (TS). Furthermore, the framework examines two critical aspects: the impact of network security on GHG emissions and the effect of emission taxation policies. These investigations are conducted through three distinct methodological approaches implemented on a modified IEEE RTS-79 24-bus test system. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed framework successfully achieves simultaneous reduction of GHG emissions and operational costs across all three approaches, validating the effectiveness of coordinated ancillary service implementation in high-renewable power systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Shoferpour, Alireza & Ghaffarpour, Reza & Zamanian, Saeid & Karimi, Ali, 2025. "A multi-objective NCUC model co-optimizing GHG emissions and market costs using multiple ancillary services in high-renewable systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225040216
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225040216
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.138379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Haites, 2018. "Carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: what have we learned?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 955-966, September.
    2. Amponsah, Nana Yaw & Troldborg, Mads & Kington, Bethany & Aalders, Inge & Hough, Rupert Lloyd, 2014. "Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: A review of lifecycle considerations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 461-475.
    3. Wang, Yujie & Tian, Jiaqiang & Sun, Zhendong & Wang, Li & Xu, Ruilong & Li, Mince & Chen, Zonghai, 2020. "A comprehensive review of battery modeling and state estimation approaches for advanced battery management systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Karimi, Hamid & Jadid, Shahram, 2020. "Optimal energy management for multi-microgrid considering demand response programs: A stochastic multi-objective framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Wang, Sarah & Tarroja, Brian & Schell, Lori Smith & Shaffer, Brendan & Samuelsen, Scott, 2019. "Prioritizing among the end uses of excess renewable energy for cost-effective greenhouse gas emission reductions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 284-298.
    6. Alirahmi, Seyed Meysam & Raisi, Afrasiab & Ghasemi, Behzad & Nadooshan, Afshin Ahmadi, 2023. "Comprehensive techno-economic assessment and tri-objective optimization of an innovative integration of compressed air energy storage system and solid oxide fuel cell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    7. Marie Renner, 2014. "Carbon prices and CCS investment: comparative study between the European Union and China," Working Papers 1402, Chaire Economie du climat.
    8. Oriza Candra & Abdeljelil Chammam & José Ricardo Nuñez Alvarez & Iskandar Muda & Hikmet Ş. Aybar, 2023. "The Impact of Renewable Energy Sources on the Sustainable Development of the Economy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-11, January.
    9. Radpour, S. & Gemechu, E. & Ahiduzzaman, Md & Kumar, A., 2021. "Developing a framework to assess the long-term adoption of renewable energy technologies in the electric power sector: The effects of carbon price and economic incentives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Hussein Jumma Jabir & Jiashen Teh & Dahaman Ishak & Hamza Abunima, 2018. "Impacts of Demand-Side Management on Electrical Power Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Majidi, Majid & Nojavan, Sayyad & Zare, Kazem, 2017. "A cost-emission framework for hub energy system under demand response program," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 157-166.
    12. Mohseni-Bonab, Seyed Masoud & Kamwa, Innocent & Rabiee, Abbas & Chung, C.Y., 2022. "Stochastic optimal transmission Switching: A novel approach to enhance power grid security margins through vulnerability mitigation under renewables uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    13. Jerry L. Holechek & Hatim M. E. Geli & Mohammed N. Sawalhah & Raul Valdez, 2022. "A Global Assessment: Can Renewable Energy Replace Fossil Fuels by 2050?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    14. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12983 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Renner, Marie, 2014. "Carbon prices and CCS investment: A comparative study between the European Union and China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 327-340.
    16. He, Hongjie & Du, Ershun & Zhang, Ning & Kang, Chongqing & Wang, Xuebin, 2021. "Enhancing the power grid flexibility with battery energy storage transportation and transmission switching," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    17. Saffari, Mohammadali & Crownshaw, Timothy & McPherson, Madeleine, 2023. "Assessing the potential of demand-side flexibility to improve the performance of electricity systems under high variable renewable energy penetration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    18. Peker, Meltem & Kocaman, Ayse Selin & Kara, Bahar Y., 2018. "Benefits of transmission switching and energy storage in power systems with high renewable energy penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1182-1197.
    19. Ruhnau, O. & Bucksteeg, M. & Ritter, D. & Schmitz, R. & Böttger, D. & Koch, M. & Pöstges, A. & Wiedmann, M. & Hirth, L., 2022. "Why electricity market models yield different results: Carbon pricing in a model-comparison experiment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiongwen Chen & Jinsuo Zhang, 2022. "Effect Mechanism Research of Carbon Price Drivers in China—A Case Study of Shenzhen," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Wei Wang & Leonid Melnyk & Oleksandra Kubatko & Bohdan Kovalov & Luc Hens, 2023. "Economic and Technological Efficiency of Renewable Energy Technologies Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Michalski, Sebastian & Hanak, Dawid P. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2020. "Advanced power cycles for coal-fired power plants based on calcium looping combustion: A techno-economic feasibility assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    4. Wu, Ke & Wang, Lei & Ha, Hengxu & Wang, Zhiyuan, 2025. "Dynamic line rating and optimal transmission switching for maximizing renewable energy sources injection with voltage stability constraint," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 378(PA).
    5. Herui Cui & Tian Zhao & Ruirui Wu, 2018. "An Investment Feasibility Analysis of CCS Retrofit Based on a Two-Stage Compound Real Options Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Hanak, Dawid P. & Kolios, Athanasios J. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2016. "Comparison of probabilistic performance of calcium looping and chemical solvent scrubbing retrofits for CO2 capture from coal-fired power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 323-336.
    7. Yang, Lin & Xu, Mao & Fan, Jingli & Liang, Xi & Zhang, Xian & Lv, Haodong & Wang, Dong, 2021. "Financing coal-fired power plant to demonstrate CCS (carbon capture and storage) through an innovative policy incentive in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    8. Hanak, Dawid P. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2016. "Calcium looping with supercritical CO2 cycle for decarbonisation of coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 343-353.
    9. Abdul Manaf, Norhuda & Qadir, Abdul & Abbas, Ali, 2016. "Temporal multiscalar decision support framework for flexible operation of carbon capture plants targeting low-carbon management of power plant emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 912-926.
    10. Yang, Lin & Lv, Haodong & Wei, Ning & Li, Yiming & Zhang, Xian, 2023. "Dynamic optimization of carbon capture technology deployment targeting carbon neutrality, cost efficiency and water stress: Evidence from China's electric power sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    11. Bo Sun & Jiajia Tao, 2024. "Investment Decisions of CCUS Projects in China Considering the Supply–Demand Relationship of CO 2 from the Industry Symbiosis Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-25, June.
    12. Muratori, Matteo & Ledna, Catherine & McJeon, Haewon & Kyle, Page & Patel, Pralit & Kim, Son H. & Wise, Marshall & Kheshgi, Haroon S. & Clarke, Leon E. & Edmonds, Jae, 2017. "Cost of power or power of cost: A U.S. modeling perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 861-874.
    13. Fan, Jing-Li & Xu, Mao & Li, Fengyu & Yang, Lin & Zhang, Xian, 2018. "Carbon capture and storage (CCS) retrofit potential of coal-fired power plants in China: The technology lock-in and cost optimization perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 326-334.
    14. Alshammari, Yousef M., 2021. "Scenario analysis for energy transition in the chemical industry: An industrial case study in Saudi Arabia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    15. Paes, Carlos Eduardo & Gandelman, Dan Abensur & Firmo, Heloisa Teixeira & Bahiense, Laura, 2022. "The power generation expansion planning in Brazil: Considering the impact of greenhouse gas emissions in an Investment Decision Model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 225-238.
    16. Chen, Yiwen & Paulus, Nora & Wan, Xi & Zou, Benteng, 2024. "Optimal timing of carbon capture and storage policies — A social planner’s view," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    17. Fan, Jing-Li & Xu, Mao & Yang, Lin & Zhang, Xian, 2019. "Benefit evaluation of investment in CCS retrofitting of coal-fired power plants and PV power plants in China based on real options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    18. Fan, Jing-Li & Xu, Mao & Yang, Lin & Zhang, Xian & Li, Fengyu, 2019. "How can carbon capture utilization and storage be incentivized in China? A perspective based on the 45Q tax credit provisions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1229-1240.
    19. Fang, Guochang & Tian, Lixin & Liu, Menghe & Fu, Min & Sun, Mei, 2018. "How to optimize the development of carbon trading in China—Enlightenment from evolution rules of the EU carbon price," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1039-1049.
    20. Zhang, Yifei & Xin, Tuantuan & Xu, Cheng, 2024. "Proposal and comparison of two heat recovery measures for the coal-based Allam cycle: Double expansion and lower turbine backpressure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225040216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.