Author
Listed:
- Huang, Linhui
- Tang, Qinglong
- Sun, Jiuling
- Cheng, Haolan
- Liu, Haifeng
- Yao, Mingfa
Abstract
The narrow-throat pre-chamber (PC) exhibits high pressure buildup and high jet velocity, resulting in superior ignition performance for lean combustion engines. Its design criterion was proposed in our previous numerical study based on a dimensionless parameter: throat diameter ratio (Rt). However, the design criterion has not been validated through experiments, and the detailed PC ignition mechanisms remain to be clarified. In this study, a narrow-throat PC and a wide-throat PC were designed for experiments based on the criterion, which were optimized numerically to maintain a similar peak pressure difference (ΔP) for the two PCs. The results reveal that the narrow-throat PC has superior ignition performance under various conditions, validating our previous design criterion. It owes to three main factors: less flame quenching, higher jet velocity, and earlier combustion phases. First, the narrow-throat PC shows more uniform jet flames while the wide-throat PC suffers from fewer ignition points due to severe flame quenching. Second, the narrow-throat PC presents stronger jets owing to the higher average mass flow discharged during the hot jet stage. Third, a stronger inflow velocity of the narrow-throat PC facilitates its earlier hot jet discharge and earlier combustion phases. Differences in ignition duration, number of ignition points, and ignition distance between the two PCs lead to distinct overall combustion patterns. Since the wide-throat PC is more restricted by quenching with smaller orifices, the disadvantages of quenching under excess air ratios (λ) of 0.8 and 0.9 outweigh the advantages of the faster flame propagation than λs of 1.2 and 1.0, respectively.
Suggested Citation
Huang, Linhui & Tang, Qinglong & Sun, Jiuling & Cheng, Haolan & Liu, Haifeng & Yao, Mingfa, 2025.
"Experimental and numerical insights into the narrow-throat pre-chamber design criterion and the ignition mechanism,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225039246
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138282
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:336:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225039246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.