Author
Listed:
- Li, Yanghui
- Lu, Qingyong
- Wu, Peng
Abstract
CO2 geological sequestration serves as a foundational technology for low-carbon fossil energy utilization and a critical pathway for achieving carbon neutrality objectives globally. This study pioneers a thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical (THMC) numerical model incorporating heterogeneous permeability distributions and time-dependent rock mechanical properties, specifically tailored for deep saline aquifers in the Xinjiang Tarim Basin. A decade-long simulation was conducted to evaluate the impacts of injection strategies on reservoir storage capacity and geomechanical stability. Key findings include: (1) High CO2 injection rates can induce transient pressure peaks, leading to compression of the rock skeleton and localized Mises stress concentration, with the maximum stress increase reaching approximately 30 %. CO2 preferentially migrates to the upper reservoir strata and attains saturation peaks ranging from 0.43 to 0.59, while thermal perturbations remain confined to near-well regions with a lateral spread of less than 100 m; (2) Gradient-accelerated injection protocols mitigate abrupt pressure fluctuations, maintaining stable porosity-permeability characteristics and homogeneous CO2 distribution. This approach reduces leakage risks by 8.2–9.7 % while maintaining CO2 storage density at approximately 17.0 Mt/km3 throughout the injection period; (3) Prolonged injection drives irreversible reservoir deformation, with cumulative vertical displacements reaching 0.25 m in subsidence and 0.05 m in uplift, thereby escalating the risks of caprock fatigue and fault reactivation. These findings establish a theoretical framework for optimizing deep saline aquifer storage systems, while highlighting that long-term chemo-mechanical coupling may exacerbate reservoir heterogeneity.
Suggested Citation
Li, Yanghui & Lu, Qingyong & Wu, Peng, 2025.
"The impact of different injection strategies on fluid migration and formation safety in CO2 saline aquifer sequestration,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225039271
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138285
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225039271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.