Author
Listed:
- Kim, Taebeen
- Oh, Seunghun
- Kim, Siwoong
- Jung, Jongyun
- Kang, Sanggyu
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the performance of a novel cascade solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) system that integrates a fuel regenerator and features a parallel stack configuration for emergency stability and to enhance operational flexibility and independent stack control. At 80 % fuel utilization for both stacks, the system achieves a maximum electrical efficiency of 66.14 %, which is 10.86 % and 6.67 % higher than those of the single-stage and anode off-gas recirculation (AOGR) SOFC systems, respectively. Exergy analysis was used to identify the location and magnitude of irreversibility within the system. The results helped optimize energy utilization in the proposed system and enabled direct comparison with conventional configurations. Among the three systems, the AOGR configuration showed the least overall exergy destruction. In the cascade system with a fuel regenerator, the catalytic combustor exhibited the highest component-level exergy destruction, followed by the external reformer, air pre-heater 1, and the fuel regenerator. The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) was evaluated to assess the system's economic feasibility. Exergoeconomic analysis converted exergy losses into cost metrics, identifying key inefficiencies in specific components. This approach supports system optimization by linking thermodynamic losses with economic performance. At 75 % fuel utilization, the LCOE of the proposed system was calculated to be 0.218 $/kWh. Both SOFC stacks showed high exergoeconomic factors of 98.3 % and 98.8 %, whereas the catalytic combustor and air pre-heater 1 had the lowest value of 11.95 %.
Suggested Citation
Kim, Taebeen & Oh, Seunghun & Kim, Siwoong & Jung, Jongyun & Kang, Sanggyu, 2025.
"4E(Energetic, Exergetic, Economic, and Exergoeconomic) analysis and optimization of fuel utilization in a methane-fueled cascade SOFC system with a fuel regenerator,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225038447
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138202
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225038447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.