Author
Listed:
- Ding, Jiangjun
- Song, Xinyu
- E, Jiaqiang
- Feng, Changling
Abstract
In this work, the reaction mechanisms under different equivalence ratios and acetylene blending ratios through chemical kinetics were investigated. The validity of the chemical reaction force field was verified using density functional theory calculations. The combustion process was divided as ignition delay, rapid combustion and post-combustion. Effects of equivalence ratio and blending ratio on hydrogen production efficiency were examined and underlying reaction pathways were analyzed to explain the observed phenomena. Additionally, the combined effects of high equivalence ratios and high blending ratios on hydrogen production efficiency were studied, highlighting their similarities and differences and the results were compared with macro-scale reactor simulations. The results show that increasing the blending ratio can enhance the hydrogen production efficiency from 17.5 % to 41.1 %, while increasing the equivalence efficiency can raise it from 17.5 % to 27.5 %. Both methods effectively increase the fuel-to-oxygen ratio (actual equivalence ratio) in the mixture, and the hydrogen production efficiency exhibits a positive correlation with the actual equivalence ratio. However, an excessively high equivalence ratio may lead to flame blow-off. In contrast, the addition of acetylene enables stable combustion at high actual equivalence ratio conditions. By analyzing hydrogen generation rates at different reaction temperatures, the first-order reaction activation energy for hydrogen production under various blending and equivalence ratios was calculated, which shows that acetylene blending can reduce the activation energy of hydrogen generation to 221.40 kJ/mol.
Suggested Citation
Ding, Jiangjun & Song, Xinyu & E, Jiaqiang & Feng, Changling, 2025.
"Reaction mechanism development of the methane-acetylene rich-combustion for the hydrogen production efficiency enhancement based on molecular dynamics simulation,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225037533
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138111
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225037533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.