IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v335y2025ics0360544225037119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of a PODE/diesel direct injection compression ignition engine with ammonia port injection for partial energy substitution

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Junheng
  • Zhao, Wenyao
  • Ji, Qian
  • Wang, Zichun
  • Zhao, Kai
  • Liu, Jinlong

Abstract

Ammonia (NH3) has emerged as a potential low-carbon fuel for heavy-duty applications, particularly in diesel-dominated sectors. The use of NH3 can partially replace diesel fuel and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by lowering the carbon content in the fuel mixture. However, its carbon reduction potential is limited by the ammonia torque replacement ratio (ATRR), defined as the ratio of the torque produced by ammonia combustion to the total engine torque. To further enhance decarbonization, polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether (PODE), a low C/H ratio fuel, can be mixed with diesel. This study experimentally investigated the combustion and emission characteristics of a PODE/diesel direct injection (DI)compression ignition (CI) engine integrated with ammonia port fuel injection (PFI) for partial energy replacement, focusing on how engine control parameters influence these characteristics, an area that has received limited attention in existing literature. The results indicated that the ammonia PFI-PODE/diesel DI CI mode increased the contribution of the premixed combustion stage and reduced that of the diffusion combustion stage, which is consistent with the characteristics of low-reactivity-fuel PFI/high-reactivity-fuel DI CI engines when the equivalence ratio of the port-injected fuel-air mixture is too lean to sustain stable flame propagation. Moreover, partially replacing PODE/diesel with ammonia eliminated the separation of the premixed combustion stages of PODE and diesel, changing the triple peaks in the heat release rate to two. In terms of emissions, NH3-PODE/diesel operation reduced soot and nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions, in addition to CO2 reduction, but led to increased unburned ammonia and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, necessitating aftertreatment to control engine-out N2O, a more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. Increasing the ATRR further reduced CO2 emissions, but ammonia slip became a major issue, reducing combustion efficiency to an unacceptable level, which limited further increases in ATRR. Advancing the injection timing improved thermal efficiency by reducing phasing loss, which in turn enhanced the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction potential, but could not be set to maximum brake torque timing due to the maximum pressure rise rate limit. Increasing injection pressure improved thermal efficiency and further reduced GHG emissions, but at the cost of higher unburned ammonia emissions. Overall, NH3-PODE/diesel operation demonstrated stable performance and significant GHG reduction potential, making it promising for heavy-duty applications, particularly in off-road sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Junheng & Zhao, Wenyao & Ji, Qian & Wang, Zichun & Zhao, Kai & Liu, Jinlong, 2025. "Performance evaluation of a PODE/diesel direct injection compression ignition engine with ammonia port injection for partial energy substitution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225037119
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225037119
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.138069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225037119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.