IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v335y2025ics0360544225036801.html

Macro algae to carbon negative methanol: Techno-economic assessment, carbon sequestration potential, and benchmarking through hydrothermal carbonization and sorbent enhanced processing

Author

Listed:
  • Sow, Massamba
  • Zaabout, Abdelghafour

Abstract

This manuscript introduces novel process schemes targeting methanol with carbon-negative potential from wet biogenic waste. It integrated hydrothermal carbonization and in-situ CO2 capture sorption-enhanced processing through energy, environmental, and economic evaluations using dedicated reactor modelling, process simulation, sizing, and cash flow analysis. Key configurations include two autothermal baseline scenarios, in addition to two other electrified configurations, namely direct (electrical heating) and indirect (via electrolyzer), introduced to improve biogenic carbon use in methanol production. A conventional biomass-to-methanol (BtM) pathway adapted to wet biogenic waste without carbon capture serves as a benchmark. The baseline scenarios present the best energy and carbon removal trade-off. High-pressure operations in baseline result in lower negative GHG emissions, while mild pressure promotes improved energy efficiency and carbon conversion. Electrification, in both cases, enhances the carbon conversion and methanol yield at the expense of poor process energy efficiency and significant GHG emissions. The grid emission factor was shown to be critical in achieving the desired GHG emissions. Baseline scenarios stay negative across a large range exceeding 1000 g-CO2eq/kWh, whereas direct and indirect achieve neutral carbon footprints at 22.3 and 383 g-CO2eq/kWh, respectively. The baseline and electrified scenarios require more capital due to their dual responsibilities in producing methanol and absorbing CO2, but they have lower operational expenses covered by carbon income than the benchmark. The benchmark has the most competitive levelized cost of production (653.32 €/t), followed by baselines and then electrified scenarios. High electricity and carbon prices make baseline scenarios more appealing than benchmark and electrified alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Sow, Massamba & Zaabout, Abdelghafour, 2025. "Macro algae to carbon negative methanol: Techno-economic assessment, carbon sequestration potential, and benchmarking through hydrothermal carbonization and sorbent enhanced processing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225036801
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225036801
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.138038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Font Palma, Carolina, 2013. "Modelling of tar formation and evolution for biomass gasification: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 129-141.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed, A.M.A & Salmiaton, A. & Choong, T.S.Y & Wan Azlina, W.A.K.G., 2015. "Review of kinetic and equilibrium concepts for biomass tar modeling by using Aspen Plus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1623-1644.
    2. Neves, Daniel & Thunman, Henrik & Tarelho, Luís & Larsson, Anton & Seemann, Martin & Matos, Arlindo, 2014. "Method for online measurement of the CHON composition of raw gas from biomass gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 932-945.
    3. Kuo, Po-Chih & Illathukandy, Biju & Wu, Wei & Chang, Jo-Shu, 2021. "Energy, exergy, and environmental analyses of renewable hydrogen production through plasma gasification of microalgal biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ismail, Tamer M. & Ramos, Ana & Abd El-Salam, M. & Brito, Paulo & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Experimental and modeling studies of Portuguese peach stone gasification on an autothermal bubbling fluidized bed pilot plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 862-877.
    5. Michela Costa & Maurizio La Villetta & Daniele Piazzullo & Domenico Cirillo, 2021. "A Phenomenological Model of a Downdraft Biomass Gasifier Flexible to the Feedstock Composition and the Reactor Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    6. Buentello-Montoya, David & Zhang, Xiaolei & Li, Jun & Ranade, Vivek & Marques, Simão & Geron, Marco, 2020. "Performance of biochar as a catalyst for tar steam reforming: Effect of the porous structure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    7. Ruivo, Luís & Silva, Tiago & Neves, Daniel & Tarelho, Luís & Frade, Jorge, 2023. "Thermodynamic guidelines for improved operation of iron-based catalysts in gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    8. Wang, Chao & Zhu, Lianfeng & Zhang, Mengjuan & Han, Zhennan & Jia, Xin & Bai, Dingrong & Duo, Wenli & Bi, Xiaotao & Abudula, Abuliti & Guan, Guoqing & Xu, Guangwen, 2022. "A two-stage circulated fluidized bed process to minimize tar generation of biomass gasification for fuel gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    9. Ravenni, Giulia & Sárossy, Zsuzsa & Ahrenfeldt, Jesper & Henriksen, Ulrik Birk, 2018. "Activity of chars and activated carbons for removal and decomposition of tar model compounds – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1044-1056.
    10. Gabriele Calì & Paolo Deiana & Claudia Bassano & Simone Meloni & Enrico Maggio & Michele Mascia & Alberto Pettinau, 2020. "Syngas Production, Clean-Up and Wastewater Management in a Demo-Scale Fixed-Bed Updraft Biomass Gasification Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Kuo, Yen-Ting & Almansa, G. Aranda & Vreugdenhil, B.J., 2018. "Catalytic aromatization of ethylene in syngas from biomass to enhance economic sustainability of gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 21-30.
    12. He, Qing & Guo, Qinghua & Umeki, Kentaro & Ding, Lu & Wang, Fuchen & Yu, Guangsuo, 2021. "Soot formation during biomass gasification: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    13. Mao, Yanpeng & Gao, Yibo & Dong, Wei & Wu, Han & Song, Zhanlong & Zhao, Xiqiang & Sun, Jing & Wang, Wenlong, 2020. "Hydrogen production via a two-step water splitting thermochemical cycle based on metal oxide – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    14. Jiang, Yuan & Zong, Peijie & Bao, Yuan & Zhang, Xin & Wei, Haixin & Tian, Bin & Tian, Yuanyu & Qiao, Yingyun & Zhang, Juntao, 2022. "Catalytic conversion of gaseous tar using coal char catalyst in the two-stage downer reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    15. Hervy, Maxime & Weiss-Hortala, Elsa & Pham Minh, Doan & Dib, Hadi & Villot, Audrey & Gérente, Claire & Berhanu, Sarah & Chesnaud, Anthony & Thorel, Alain & Le Coq, Laurence & Nzihou, Ange, 2019. "Reactivity and deactivation mechanisms of pyrolysis chars from bio-waste during catalytic cracking of tar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 487-499.
    16. Shen, Yafei & Zhao, Peitao & Shao, Qinfu & Takahashi, Fumitake & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2015. "In situ catalytic conversion of tar using rice husk char/ash supported nickel–iron catalysts for biomass pyrolytic gasification combined with the mixing-simulation in fluidized-bed gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 808-819.
    17. Kalina, Jacek, 2017. "Techno-economic assessment of small-scale integrated biomass gasification dual fuel combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2499-2507.
    18. Mayu Hamazaki & Shan Miao & Mitsuo Kameyama & Hisashi Kamiuchi & Kiyoshi Dowaki, 2024. "CFD Simulation of Moving-Bed Pyrolizer for Sewage Sludge Considering Gas and Tar Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Zhang, Ziyin & Pang, Shusheng, 2019. "Experimental investigation of tar formation and producer gas composition in biomass steam gasification in a 100 kW dual fluidised bed gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 416-424.
    20. Chen, Tao & Sjöblom, Jonas & Ström, Henrik, 2022. "Numerical investigations of soot generation during wood-log combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225036801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.