IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v335y2025ics0360544225036710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systemic comparison of machine learning models in the optimization of flow field design for proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Ke
  • Liang, Zhendong
  • Jiang, Haolin
  • Luan, Yang
  • Su, Xunkang
  • Zheng, Tongxi
  • Liu, Mingxin
  • Feng, Yihui
  • Li, Wenfei
  • Chen, Yongbang
  • Lu, Guolong
  • Liu, Zhenning

Abstract

The efficacy of proton exchange membrane fuel cells is critically influenced by flow field design. While machine learning (ML) has gained traction in fuel cell flow field (FCFF) optimization, fragmented adoption of regression models across studies impedes rigorous performance benchmarking. This work presents a systematic comparative analysis of five advanced machine learning regressors (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Machine, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine, and Categorical Boosting) for FCFF optimization. Four hyperparameter optimization strategies (Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Grid Search, Random Search, and Bayesian Optimization) were implemented to enhance model performance. Quantitative evaluation through R2, mean squared error (MSE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) metrics across 20 model-algorithm configurations revealed significant algorithm-dependent model performance variations. Notably, all investigated models demonstrated superior predictive capability (R2 > 0.92) when coupled with appropriate optimization algorithms. The XGBoost-PSO combination achieved exceptional performance with a coefficient of determination of 0.992, requiring only 6.38 s for model training. Feature importance analysis through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values provided critical insights into parameter influence patterns. This systematic investigation underscores the critical importance of algorithm selection in ML-driven optimization frameworks and demonstrates the synergistic potential of optimized model-algorithm pairs for advancing FCFF design. The methodology establishes a robust benchmark for future computational optimization studies in fuel cell engineering.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Ke & Liang, Zhendong & Jiang, Haolin & Luan, Yang & Su, Xunkang & Zheng, Tongxi & Liu, Mingxin & Feng, Yihui & Li, Wenfei & Chen, Yongbang & Lu, Guolong & Liu, Zhenning, 2025. "Systemic comparison of machine learning models in the optimization of flow field design for proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225036710
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.138029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225036710
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.138029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225036710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.