Author
Listed:
- Akhtar, Muhammad Usman Saeed
- Asfand, Faisal
- Khan, M. Imran
- Mishra, Rakesh
Abstract
The global shift towards sustainable energy solutions has increased the demand for cleaner fuels in internal combustion engines, with hydrogen offering significant potential due to its zero-carbon nature and superior combustion properties. This study conducts a comprehensive numerical analysis of how engine geometry—specifically stroke length, bore size, and the associated compression ratio—affects the combustion, performance, and emission characteristics of a hydrogen–diesel dual-fuel (HDDF) compression ignition engine. Validated three-dimensional CFD simulations were performed for hydrogen energy shares (HESs) of 24 %, 57 %, 73 %, and 90 %, under high and low load conditions. Results show that increasing stroke length improves in-cylinder pressure, heat release rate (HRR), and brake thermal efficiency (BTE), with BTE rising by up to 9 % at high load and 73 % HES. However, under low load, longer strokes led to a BTE drop of up to 29 % at 90 % HES. Bore enlargement consistently reduced BTE—by up to 17 % at high load and 27 % at low load—due to reduced compression ratios and weakened combustion intensity. Emission analysis revealed that NOx emissions increased by 38 % at high load and 73 % HES with stroke extension, and by as much as 64 % under low load at 90 % HES. Conversely, increasing bore size reduced NOx by up to 16 % at high load and 13 % at low load, but resulted in sharp rises in CO, UHC, and soot—exceeding 100 % in some cases. These findings underscore the importance of optimising stroke–bore geometry based on hydrogen substitution level and engine load to balance efficiency gains with emission control in HDDF engine applications.
Suggested Citation
Akhtar, Muhammad Usman Saeed & Asfand, Faisal & Khan, M. Imran & Mishra, Rakesh, 2025.
"Assessment of geometric variations on efficiency and emissions of a Hydrogen–Diesel dual-fuel engine using CFD approach,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225036023
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137960
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225036023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.