Author
Abstract
Global warming driven by persistent carbon emissions has made emission reduction a pressing research focus. Understanding how urban agglomeration spatial structures influence carbon emission performance is essential for developing effective mitigation strategies. This study examines 13 urban agglomerations in China from 2006 to 2020. A two-dimensional framework is proposed to capture spatial structure, encompassing both morphological and functional dimensions. A Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression model is employed at both the city and county scales. The results indicate that: (1) Spatial morphological structures show a general trend toward monocentricity at both scales. (2) Functional structures become increasingly monocentric patterns at the city scale while remaining relatively stable at the county scale. (3) Carbon emission performance has improved overall, yet interregional disparities have widened. (4) The influence of spatial structure on carbon emission performance shows significant structure type and scale-dependent characteristics. At the city scale, the polycentricity of spatial morphological and functional structures is unstable in its direction of influence and lacks consistency. In contrast, at the county scale, morphological polycentricity continues to inhibit carbon emission performance, while functional polycentricity continues to promote performance enhancement. (5) Most control variables significantly affect carbon performance at city and county scales, but these effects' direction, strength, and temporal pattern vary across scales. These results provide new insights into the spatial mechanisms underlying low-carbon development and offer a theoretical basis for designing targeted emission reduction strategies tailored to varying spatial structures and governance contexts.
Suggested Citation
Zeng, Peng & Liang, Liying, 2025.
"Polycentricity or monocentricity? A multi-scale assessment of how urban agglomeration structures influence carbon emission performance in China,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225035674
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137925
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225035674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.