IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v335y2025ics036054422503556x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Whether the electrochemical energy storage show positive role to achieve the green and low-carbon goal in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Hongliang
  • Liu, Ziyi
  • Yu, Yajuan

Abstract

This study uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the environmental impacts of electrochemical energy storage (EES). We define the functional unit as the combined “Power source + EES” system at a representative Chinese station and establish cradle-to-grave boundaries covering production, transportation, operation, and disposal stage. Based on data from a specific EES, we construct a detailed lifecycle inventory and assess impacts across all stages. The results indicate that the LFP battery is the primary component to environmental burdens, accounting for over 70 % of the total impact in 7 out of 10 environmental impact categories. The operation stage emerges as the predominant phase, responsible for more than 65 % of the total lifecycle environmental burdens across 7 of the 10 categories. Environmental benefits primarily originate from increased renewable energy integration enabled by EES installation during the operation stage, whereas the disposal stage yields net environmental benefits across all impact categories except one. As renewable energy penetration rises, these benefits grow significantly, while burdens decline for all categories except two.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Hongliang & Liu, Ziyi & Yu, Yajuan, 2025. "Whether the electrochemical energy storage show positive role to achieve the green and low-carbon goal in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s036054422503556x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422503556X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.137914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s036054422503556x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.