Author
Abstract
In the context of global climate governance, the green development of China's construction industry is crucial, as it is one of the three key areas of energy consumption. This paper constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model to study policy optimization strategies in terms of the stage of green buildings (GBs) and the heterogeneity of consumer preferences. The research results show that: (i) Developers' green behaviours are more responsive in price-sensitive markets, general contractors' green behaviours show more volatility in green-sensitive markets. (ii) The impact of consumer sensitivity levels on green building development is characterized by stages. In the development stage, a moderate level of green sensitivity helps to incentivize green building pioneers; in the introduction stage, there exists an optimal sensitivity interval, which depends on enterprises' innovation level; in the growth stage, it faces the trade-off between the risk of “greenwashing” and market failure. In the maturity stage, the low-to-medium level of consumer sensitivity helps the green building market develop soundly. (iii) The government plays different roles in the whole life cycle of GBs, an advocate at the development stage, an encourager at the introduction stage, a regulator at the growth stage, and a maintainer at the maturity stage, fully releasing the role of the market in the coordination of supply and demand and resource allocation. On this basis, combined with the product life cycle theory, a multi-principal synergistic promotion mechanism at different stages is proposed. It provides a policy reference for promoting green building development.
Suggested Citation
Lv, Ling & Zhao, Aiwu, 2025.
"Study on multi-party evolutionary game of green behaviour among construction industry practitioners considering consumer preferences,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s036054422503508x
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137866
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:335:y:2025:i:c:s036054422503508x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.